-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should the mapping output for a given row include a reference to the CSV source row? #98
Comments
I think adding the information using, for example, the fragment id, would be indeed useful ivan
Ivan Herman, W3C |
I think this is likely to be difficult to define and implement given the flexibility in how the tables that are converted are generated based on files that might have multiple header lines etc. I'd suggest leaving it for now. |
Yeah... but we may hit the same issues with the usage of the fragment id-s elsewhere, eg, for annotation. If we find a decent solution at that point, we can adopt it for this case, too. I agree to leave this unchanged for now, but let us leave the option open. Ivan
Ivan Herman, W3C |
RESOLUTION: resolve #98 and #101 as Gregg suggests (from http://www.w3.org/2015/01/28-csvw-minutes.html). |
Resolution was to always emit a |
csv2rdf and csv2json docs updated as per resolution. |
Should the row mapping include a property to identify the source row from which it was derived; e.g.
rdfs:isDefinedBy
from RDF Schema 1.1?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: