Explain relationship between controller documents and JOSE headers

[andresuribe87]

          Just read that section, and I have to say that it's not intuitive at all. I think it would be worth either: adding an example that refers to this controller document, pointing to the spec you mentioned, or explicitly stating the relationship between controller docs and  `iss` & `kid`.

Originally posted by @andresuribe87 in #104 (comment)

[OR13]

Dupe of / related to....:

• About the optionality of the "kid" field in JWT-formatted VCs/VPs #31
• Accept or Dismiss the guidance provided by DIF on kid / iss #30
• Clarify relationship between "iss" and "issuer" #22
• Verification Method type used with VC-JWT #83

cc @mprorock @selfissued @Sakurann this keeps coming up, it would be nice if one of you would open a PR to resolve.

[OR13]

[OR13]

[selfissued]

PR #144 will address this issue.

[iherman]

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-09-14

• no resolutions were taken

View the transcript

6.13. Explain relationship between controller documents and JOSE headers (issue vc-jose-cose#106)

See github issue vc-jose-cose#106.

Michael Jones: overtaken by the decision to re-do controller doc PR.

[OR13]

I think this has been addressed.