Update C42 to address issue 2433

[fstrr]

closes #2433

1. Added a technique on undersized targets relevant to Target Size (Minimum)
2. Updated the existing examples, that are relevant to Target Size (Enhanced) to simplify the images and update the code
3. Retitled C42 from "Using min-height and min-width to ensure sufficient target spacing" to "Using CSS to ensure sufficient target spacing"
4. Updated the working examples to add the new undersized-targets example and updated examples from the Technique document
5. Added a link to C42 from Target Size (Enhanced) and Target Size (Minimum).

[bruce-usab]

Looks really good, but it is so different I would have expected a new technique (with a new number) rather than repurposing an obsolete technique.

[patrickhlauke]

looking at https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/issue-2433/techniques/css/C42.html and https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/issue-2433/working-examples/css-sufficient-target-spacing/index.html ... I would question the use of rem there. This makes the size dependent on the root element's font size, which may be the default 16px ... or it may not. I'd say just go with explicit 44px.

more fundamentally, if the idea here is that we want to separate out AA and AAA, and the new https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/issue-2433/techniques/css/adding-spacing-to-undersized-targets.html technique is meant to cover the AA scenario ... then I'd question what that first example in C42 is meant to convey? AAA doesn't have any kind of spacing clause, so what's the point of showing targets that are smaller than 44x44px but then saying that they have sufficient spacing? am I missing something?

[fstrr]

Thanks for the feedback. This is what happens when trying to edit documents and deal with school runs and sick kids. I'm glad you're as thorough as always with your reviews.

1. I've replaced the description in C42 so it removes references to all the 24px content.
2. I've updated the code in C42 to use px instead of rem
3. I've updated the working examples for C42 to use px instead of rem

I think that resolves the issues you raised.

[patrickhlauke]

But assuming C42 is intended to serve as technique for 2.5.5 Target Size (Enhanced) (AAA), it needs to remove the whole "spacing" angle (in the title, initial description, and all of the first example), as the AAA version can't be passed with spacing.

[patrickhlauke]

to be less cryptic/more specific about what I mean for C42 - if it's intended as a technique for 2.5.5 Target Size (Enhanced) only:

• rename this to "Using CSS to ensure sufficient target size" (not "spacing")
• change the actual description ... it's not about spacing, but pure size (since 2.5.5 doesn't have any exemption/stipulation for spacing)
• remove first example completely
• tweak the introductory paragraph for the other example (remove the "and not on the list items.")
• change the caption for the figure from "Example of using CSS to ensure enough spacing within targets" to "Example of using CSS to ensure a sufficiently large target size" or similar

unless i'm misunderstanding what this PR is trying to achieve...is it trying to provide examples that cover both 2.5.5 and 2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum)? If so, that makes it weirdly confusing (and the test procedure at the end of C42 is still only about meeting 2.5.5). i thought the decision (from skimming meeting minutes etc) was to have two clearly separate techniques, one for 2.5.5, one for 2.5.8?

[patrickhlauke]

@fstrr as I see a "Francis will figure it out" in the meeting minutes from yesterday, and the idea is indeed to make C42 explicitly about AAA, then #3231 (comment) should cover most of what should really change here (plus @dbjorge's comments above, which in part mirror what I noted in that comment)

[fstrr]

I think that's all the suggestions included. Relevant pages:

• raw githack C42
• raw githack adding spacing to undersized targets

[patrickhlauke]

Perfect, thank you @fstrr

[fstrr]

Thanks for your patience, @patrickhlauke

[dbjorge]

Thanks @fstrr! Looks good overall, a few minor/editoral suggestions inline

[dbjorge]

Suggested change

	<p>The objective of this technique is to ensure that links in navigation menus have enough spacing around them so each link measures at least 24px width and 24px height. The aim is to provide an adequate target clearance to prevent accidental pointer activation of adjacent targets.</p>
	<p>The objective of this technique is to ensure that links in navigation menus have enough spacing around them to meet the requirements of the spacing exception in Success Criterion 2.5.8, Target Size (Minimum). The aim is to provide an adequate target clearance to prevent accidental pointer activation of adjacent targets.</p>

[dbjorge]

The term inline has a specific meaning in CSS that is different from the meaning established by the SC's Inline exception; since this is a CSS example, I think it'd be good to avoid the ambiguity by spelling out the SC meaning.

Suggested change

	<p>For each undersized target that has no equivalent, that isn't inline or otherwise constrained by the line-height of non-target text, that hasn't had its size modified by the author, and whose presentation isn't essential:</p>
	<p>For each undersized target that has no equivalent, that isn't in a sentence or otherwise constrained by the line-height of non-target text, that hasn't had its size modified by the author, and whose presentation isn't essential:</p>

[dbjorge]

Suggested change

	<li><a href="adding-spacing-to-undersized-targets.html">CXXXXXX</a></li>
	<li><a href="C44">C44</a></li>

[dbjorge]

For consistency with other techniques:

Suggested change

	<li><a href="C42.html">Using CSS to ensure sufficient target size</a></li>
	<li><a href="C42">C42</a></li>