-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
Conversation
Incorporated feedback on the SC language by removing "information," which was a redundancy in terms. Added glossary terms for cardinal directions, long documents, complex information, and non-numerical value.
The original issue can be found at the following address: w3c#32
As part of the consensus process, the following sentence was removed from Provide Support (line 828): "Where an understanding of mathematics is not a primary requirement for using this content, reinforce numbers with non-numerical values." As this SC moves forward, this phrase needs to be reevaluated and discussed with the WCAG group because it specifically addresses the needs of people with dyscalculia. The original Help issue can be found at the following address: w3c#32.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please delete "
Context-sensitive help is available.
"
Delete the last sentence about context sensitive help. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made a few editorial suggestions. Hopefully they are helpful.
<section class="sc"> | ||
<h4>Provide Support</h4> | ||
<p class="conformance-level">AA</p> | ||
<p class="change">Content is provided that helps users understand complex information, long documents, numerical information, relative and cardinal directions (North, South, East, and West), forms and non-standard controls.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Change "that helps" to "to help". It's a subtle edit, but means the difference between proving you provided help, and proving you actually helped users (which, of course, cannot be guaranteed even with usability testing).
- Is it necessary to repeat "(north, south, east, and west)" here if it is being defined in the glossary?
- Change "complex information" to "complex relationships" (see my glossary suggestion)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks - good ideas
<dt><dfn>correct reading sequence</dfn></dt> | ||
<dt><dfn>complex information</dfn></dt> | ||
<dd> | ||
<p>Something with at least 3 parts where at least 2 of those parts interact with each other in multiple ways.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe change this to "complex relationships" to make it less abstract and ambiguous? Then a definition like this might work:
connections between at least 3 objects, concepts, or people, where at least 2 of those parts interact with each other in multiple ways
The original Help issue can be found at the following address: #32