Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vocabulary references rdf:Resource, should be rdfs:Resource #326

Closed
gkellogg opened this issue Jul 11, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Vocabulary references rdf:Resource, should be rdfs:Resource #326

gkellogg opened this issue Jul 11, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

In particular renderedVia. Also, PreferContainedDescriptions and PreferContainedIRIs have the wrong rdf:type.

@iherman iherman added this to the V1 PR milestone Aug 1, 2016
gkellogg added a commit to ruby-rdf/rdf-vocab that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2016
@gkellogg
Copy link
Member Author

I'm wondering why this is outstanding for so long? It seems easy to fix:

@BigBlueHat
Copy link
Member

Not sure why this one's gotten missed. I'm marking it as editor_action which should more clearly add it to @azaroth42's list. 😉

Thanks for staying on it!

@azaroth42
Copy link
Collaborator

Apologies for the ridiculously long delays... day job and all that. Fixed the instances, and took the range out of renderedVia, as it doesn't say anything.

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Rob, I'll update gems and the test results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants