Skip to content

Conversation

tidoust
Copy link
Member

@tidoust tidoust commented Sep 4, 2025

Time to give v7 a try in real life, following iterations and discussions in: #1519

Note: the way we managed alpha versions was somewhat clunky. The version increment should have appeared after the alpha flag. This update drops the alpha flag, which means that the first actual published package will be 7.0.11 and not 7.0.0.

Plan is to continue to publish v6 for a little while to give consumers enough time to adjust their code and provide a fallback plan should the new version turn out to be impractical.

Another note: it's possible that an actual CSS update is needed for the code that detects the need to publish new releases to work. There should be no hurry to publish in any case...

Time to give v7 a try in real life, following iterations and discussions in:
#1519

Note: the way we managed alpha versions was somewhat clunky. The version
increment should have appeared *after* the `alpha` flag. This update drops the
`alpha` flag, which means that the first actual published package will be
`7.0.11` and not `7.0.0`.

Plan is to continue to publish v6 for a little while to give consumers enough
time to adjust their code and provide a fallback plan should the new version
turn out to be impractical.
@tidoust tidoust merged commit c38af31 into main Sep 4, 2025
1 check passed
@tidoust tidoust deleted the css-v7 branch September 4, 2025 09:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants