Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Streams General issue #92

Closed
torgo opened this issue Oct 30, 2015 · 11 comments
Closed

Streams General issue #92

torgo opened this issue Oct 30, 2015 · 11 comments
Assignees

Comments

@torgo
Copy link
Member

torgo commented Oct 30, 2015

As minuted at TPAC 2015 wrap-up session: https://pad.w3ctag.org/p/30-10-2015-minutes.md

@torgo
Copy link
Member Author

torgo commented Nov 11, 2015

discussed 11-11 – we need to get someone like @domenic and Chris Wilson on the same call... F2F time would be good. Analysis document needed. "Streams in the Web" ...

@torgo torgo added this to the tag-f2f-melbourne-2016-01-13 milestone Nov 11, 2015
@travisleithead
Copy link
Contributor

We are looking for a document that clearly defines the different high-level categories of streams: byte streams, timed streams, object streams. We want the document to clearly define some terminology that can be reused among various folks talking about streams (e.g., WebRTC media streams, etc.), and potential conversion patterns between each type of stream (since they can be converted and have specific conversion paradigms). This would help frame some of the existing streams conversations.

@torgo
Copy link
Member Author

torgo commented Mar 31, 2016

Taken up at London F2f

@travisleithead
Copy link
Contributor

Taking a look at : https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/

@travisleithead
Copy link
Contributor

The above-mentioned document can start with a spec-review of the Streams spec...

@torgo
Copy link
Member Author

torgo commented Jul 30, 2016

Taken up at Stockholm f2f. Yes we will produce something. @ylafon will start a document and we will work on this and review at a TPAC. See minutes from day 3 and whiteboard pics:
img_1107
img_1108

@travisleithead
Copy link
Contributor

Goal:

  • Get the various streams straightened out
  • understand the use cases
  • Write it all down (or at least the good parts) into our Design guidelines.

@torgo
Copy link
Member Author

torgo commented Sep 26, 2017

Agreed we make a start on this. @travisleithead @slightlyoff @cynthia to make a start at a break-out session on Thursday.

@travisleithead
Copy link
Contributor

Additional relevant meeting minutes: https://pad.w3ctag.org/p/2016-07-30

@travisleithead
Copy link
Contributor

OK, new plan:

Per my previous comment, one of the main goals of this work is to produce text to go into the design-guidelines. We will be moving the bulk of this issue from the design-reviews repo into w3ctag/design-principles#86.

The other part of this work was to do archiology to existing parts of the web platform that aren't using streams but should be. @cynthia will be drafting a blog post, where we will try to crowdsource this question (along with Promises).

@travisleithead
Copy link
Contributor

And now, thank you for flying TAG..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants