Skip to content

handle private keys equal to n-1 #191

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2020
Merged

handle private keys equal to n-1 #191

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2020

Conversation

tomato42
Copy link
Member

fixes #190

@tomato42 tomato42 added the bug unintended behaviour in ecdsa code label Mar 12, 2020
@tomato42 tomato42 self-assigned this Mar 12, 2020
@tomato42 tomato42 mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2020
Closed
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 12, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 97.021% when pulling 087513b on tomato42:unlikely-keys into d3b7289 on warner:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 97.021% when pulling 3128956 on tomato42:unlikely-keys into d3b7289 on warner:master.

@inikolchev
Copy link

@tomato42 Looks good to me.

@tomato42 tomato42 merged commit fa18c32 into tlsfuzzer:master Mar 13, 2020
@tomato42 tomato42 deleted the unlikely-keys branch March 13, 2020 10:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@tomato42 tomato42

Labels
bug unintended behaviour in ecdsa code
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

VerifyingKey Q=(n-1)*G fails with "AttributeError"
3 participants
@tomato42 @coveralls @inikolchev