Update source-map-dev-tool-plugin.mdx #6986
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Hello, I think the word 'next' used here is confusing. If the intent of the author was 'the content directly after this sentence' then using 'the following' would be way better and understandable. Please advise/review.
|
|
|
@slav-getov is attempting to deploy a commit to the Webpack Docs Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Hey when someone sees/decides this is fine should I authorise first or wait for the review? Thank you! |
Hi, please sign the CLA here https://api.easycla.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/v2/repository-provider/github/sign/18915764/61886109/6986/#/?version=2, the change looks good to me. |
|
I have signed the easyCLA, do I need verbal account too? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
I think the word 'next' used here is confusing. If the intent of the author was 'the content directly after this sentence' then using 'the following' would be way better and understandable.
Please advise/review.