Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update mocha to the latest version 🚀 #74

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Apr 24, 2017

Version 3.3.0 of mocha just got published.

Dependency mocha
Current Version 3.2.0
Type devDependency

The version 3.3.0 is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of mocha.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Release Notes coverave

Thanks to all our contributors, maintainers, sponsors, and users! ❤️

As highlights:

  • We've got coverage now!
  • Testing is looking less flaky \o/.
  • No more nitpicking about "mocha.js" build on PRs.

🎉 Enhancements

  • #2659: Adds support for loading reporter from an absolute or relative path (@sul4bh)
  • #2769: Support --inspect-brk on command-line (@igwejk)

🐛 Fixes

  • #2662: Replace unicode chars w/ hex codes in HTML reporter (@rotemdan)

🔍 Coverage

🔩 Other

Commits

The new version differs by 89 commits0.

  • fb1687e :ship: Release v3.3.0
  • 1943e02 Add Changelog for v3.3.0
  • 861e968 Refactor literal play-icon hex code to a var
  • 1d3c5bc Fix typo in karma.conf.js
  • 9bd9389 Fix spec paths in test HTML files
  • 0a93024 Adds tests for loading reporters w/ relative/absolute paths (#2773)
  • 73929ad Comment special treatment of '+' in URL query parsing
  • e2c9514 Merge pull request #2769 from igwejk/support_inspect_break_in_opts
  • 038c636 Support --inspect-brk on command-line
  • b4ebabd Merge pull request #2727 from lamby/reproducible-build
  • 882347b Please make the build reproducible.
  • a2fc76c Merge pull request #2703 from seppevs/cover_utils_some_fn_with_tests
  • ed61cd0 cover .some() function in utils.js with tests
  • f42cbf4 Merge pull request #2701 from craigtaub/landingSpec
  • 6065242 use stubbed symbol

There are 89 commits in total.

See the full diff

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 95.876% when pulling adf0ff5 on greenkeeper/mocha-3.3.0 into 8c10fdf on master.

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2017
greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2017
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 14, 2017

Version 3.4.1 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

Release Notes Ohai CRLF...

Fixed a publishing mishap with git's autocrlf settings.

Commits

The new version differs by 3 commits0.

false

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 15, 2017

Version 3.4.0 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2017
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 24, 2017

Version 3.4.2 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

Release Notes fake-success

3.4.2 / 2017-05-24

🐛 Fixes

🔩 Other

Commits

The new version differs by commits.

See the full diff

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot closed this Jul 24, 2017
@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot deleted the greenkeeper/mocha-3.3.0 branch July 24, 2017 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant