Have your cake and eat it too. Who says you can't have nice things in an efficient, type-safe, compiled language? Don't let your Python-slinging coworkers have the last laugh, this is C++ Range:
#include <iostream>
#include "range.h"
using namespace whoshuu;
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
for (auto i : range(100)) {
std::cout << i << std::endl; // Prints 0 to 99
}
for (auto i : range(10, 100)) {
std::cout << i << std::endl; // Prints 10 to 99
}
for (auto i : range(10, 0, -1) {
std::cout << i << std::endl; // Prints 10 to 1, counting down
}
for (auto i : range(2.718, 100.0, 3.14) {
std::cout << i << std::endl; // Prints 2.178 to 96.918, by increments of π, yum!
}
}
Here's a benchmark using gcc-5.1 with -O2 optimization of my library against a naive vector range implementation and basic for-loop:
As you can see, C++ Range behaves identically to a basic for-loop, and both outperform the vector implementation considerably (the last data point is left off because it would ruin the nice benchmark image here!).
You can find raw data for the analysis here.
Just throw the header into your project, be wary of the whoshuu
namespace, and let it rip!
For a more fully featured iterator toolset, check out Ryan Haining's cppitertool library, which implements most of the Python itertool module in C++. There's also Eric Niebler's range-v3, a formally proposed range library for the C++ standard library.
The only explicit requirement is a C++11 compatible compiler such as clang, gcc, or a recent version of MSVC. The minimum required version of gcc is unknown, so if anyone has trouble using library with a specific version of gcc, do let me know.
Please fork this repository and contribute back using pull requests. Features can be requested using issues. All code, comments, and critiques are greatly appreciated.