Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency apple/swift-syntax to v510 - autoclosed #31

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 12, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
apple/swift-syntax major 0.50100.0 -> 510.0.3

Release Notes

apple/swift-syntax (apple/swift-syntax)

v510.0.3

Compare Source

Compared to 510.0.2 improves swift-syntax’s ability to build using Bazel.

It also contains the following changes from 510.0.0.

New APIs
Deprecations
API-Incompatible Changes
  • NoteMessage.fixItID renamed to noteID

  • DiagnosticSpec.highlight replaced by highlights

    • Description: The use of a single string highlight prevented users from asserting that a macro highlighted exactly the expected set of syntax nodes. Use of DiagnosticSpec.init(...highlight:...) is deprecated and forwards to DiagnosticSpec.init(...highlights:...). Migrating from highlight to highlights is straightforward; any uses of DiagnosticSpec.init which do not specify a highlight do not need to change, otherwise:
      • If the diagnostic highlights a single node, the highlight string should be replaced with a single element array containing the same string without any trailing trivia, e.g., highlight: "let " -> highlights: ["let"].
      • If the diagnostic highlights multiple nodes, the highlight string should be replaced with an array containing an element for each highlighted node, e.g., highlight: "struct {}" -> highlights: ["struct", "{}"].
    • Pull Request: https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax/pull/2213

v510.0.2

Compare Source

Compared to 510.0.1 this release fixes compilation warnings about retroactive conformances when building swift-syntax with a Swift 6 compiler.

It also contains the following changes from 510.0.0.

New APIs

Deprecations

API-Incompatible Changes

  • NoteMessage.fixItID renamed to noteID

  • DiagnosticSpec.highlight replaced by highlights

    • Description: The use of a single string highlight prevented users from asserting that a macro highlighted exactly the expected set of syntax nodes. Use of DiagnosticSpec.init(...highlight:...) is deprecated and forwards to DiagnosticSpec.init(...highlights:...). Migrating from highlight to highlights is straightforward; any uses of DiagnosticSpec.init which do not specify a highlight do not need to change, otherwise:
      • If the diagnostic highlights a single node, the highlight string should be replaced with a single element array containing the same string without any trailing trivia, e.g., highlight: "let " -> highlights: ["let"].
      • If the diagnostic highlights multiple nodes, the highlight string should be replaced with an array containing an element for each highlighted node, e.g., highlight: "struct {}" -> highlights: ["struct", "{}"].
    • Pull Request: https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax/pull/2213

v510.0.1

Compare Source

Compared to 510.0.0 this fixes a possible misaligned memory access.

It also contains the following changes from 510.0.0.

New APIs

Deprecations

API-Incompatible Changes

  • NoteMessage.fixItID renamed to noteID

  • DiagnosticSpec.highlight replaced by highlights

    • Description: The use of a single string highlight prevented users from asserting that a macro highlighted exactly the expected set of syntax nodes. Use of DiagnosticSpec.init(...highlight:...) is deprecated and forwards to DiagnosticSpec.init(...highlights:...). Migrating from highlight to highlights is straightforward; any uses of DiagnosticSpec.init which do not specify a highlight do not need to change, otherwise:
      • If the diagnostic highlights a single node, the highlight string should be replaced with a single element array containing the same string without any trailing trivia, e.g., highlight: "let " -> highlights: ["let"].
      • If the diagnostic highlights multiple nodes, the highlight string should be replaced with an array containing an element for each highlighted node, e.g., highlight: "struct {}" -> highlights: ["struct", "{}"].
    • Pull Request: https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax/pull/2213

v510.0.0

Compare Source

New APIs

Deprecations

API-Incompatible Changes

  • NoteMessage.fixItID renamed to noteID

  • DiagnosticSpec.highlight replaced by highlights

    • Description: The use of a single string highlight prevented users from asserting that a macro highlighted exactly the expected set of syntax nodes. Use of DiagnosticSpec.init(...highlight:...) is deprecated and forwards to DiagnosticSpec.init(...highlights:...). Migrating from highlight to highlights is straightforward; any uses of DiagnosticSpec.init which do not specify a highlight do not need to change, otherwise:
      • If the diagnostic highlights a single node, the highlight string should be replaced with a single element array containing the same string without any trailing trivia, e.g., highlight: "let " -> highlights: ["let"].
      • If the diagnostic highlights multiple nodes, the highlight string should be replaced with an array containing an element for each highlighted node, e.g., highlight: "struct {}" -> highlights: ["struct", "{}"].
    • Pull Request: https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax/pull/2213

v509.1.1

Compare Source

Fixes an issue that caused the swift-parser-cli target to not build on visionOS.

v509.1.0

Compare Source

v509.0.2

Compare Source

Fixes a possible misaligned memory access

v509.0.1

Compare Source

Fixes the following issues:

v509.0.0

Compare Source

This is the 509.0.0 release of SwiftSyntax, aligned with Swift 5.9.

To use this snapshot add the following dependency to your Package.swift:

.package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax", from: "509.0.0")

v508.0.1

Compare Source

This release of SwiftSyntax is aligned with the release of Swift 5.8.

Compared to 508.0.0, this release relaxes the version requirement for swift-argument-parser, resulting in fewer version conflicts for users of SwiftSyntax.

v508.0.0

Compare Source

This is the 508.0.0 release of SwiftSyntax, aligned with the release of Swift 5.8.

To use this snapshot add the following dependency to your Package.swift:

.package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax", from: "508.0.0")

v0.50700.1

Compare Source

This is the 0.50700.1 release of SwiftSyntax that vends the parser library (_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser.dylib) as a binary framework dependency on macOS.

To use this snapshot add the following dependency to your Package.swift:

.package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax", branch: "0.50700.1")

Or, if using a swift-tools-version ≤ 5.4:

.package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax", .branch("0.50700.1"))

⚠️ Important: This release of SwiftSyntax is incompatible with the parser library included in the swift-5.7-RELEASE toolchain. On Linux, download a recent swift-5.7-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT toolchain to use this SwiftSyntax version. On macOS, this version of SwiftSyntax is compatible with any recent Swift or Xcode toolchain because it includes the parser library as a binary dependency.

v0.50700.0

Compare Source

This is the 0.50700.0 release of SwiftSyntax that vends the parser library (_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser.dylib) as a binary framework dependency on macOS.

To use this snapshot add the following dependency to your Package.swift:

.package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax", branch: "0.50700.0")

Or, if using a swift-tools-version ≤ 5.4:

.package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax", .branch("0.50700.0"))

v0.50600.1

Compare Source

This is the 0.50600.1 release of SwiftSyntax that vends the parser library (_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser.dylib) as a binary framework dependency on macOS.

To use this snapshot add the following dependency to your Package.swift:

.package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax", branch: "0.50600.1")

Or, if using a swift-tools-version ≤ 5.4:

.package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax", .branch("0.50600.1"))

v0.50600.0

Compare Source

This is the 0.50600.0 release of SwiftSyntax that vends the parser library (_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser.dylib) as a binary framework dependency on macOS.

To use this snapshot add the following dependency to your Package.swift:

.package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax", branch: "0.50600.0")

Or, if using a swift-tools-version ≤ 5.4:

.package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-syntax", .branch("0.50600.0"))

v0.50500.0

Compare Source

v0.50400.0

Compare Source

v0.50300.0

Compare Source

v0.50200.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/apple-swift-syntax-510.x branch from 9d659e3 to 032a99d Compare May 7, 2024 19:14
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/apple-swift-syntax-510.x branch from 032a99d to 9e7bc83 Compare August 2, 2024 01:58
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency apple/swift-syntax to v510 chore(deps): update dependency apple/swift-syntax to v510 - autoclosed Sep 13, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this Sep 13, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/apple-swift-syntax-510.x branch September 13, 2024 23:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants