-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
Add strict/no-strict mode for taxonomy list #256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
What would strict mean here? What issue does it solve? |
@swissspidy I am working on this issue: #181 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added a few comments in-line into the PR for changes to make.
Also, please add one or more functional tests to cover this new flag.
Great, code looks good. Can you add one or more functional tests to make sure it also works as expected? |
@schlessera . I'll be adding the functional tests over the weekend. Thanks 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two CS tweaks only.
@schlessera for this, does it need a check here in FeatureContext ? |
Oh, thanks @thrijith, somehow I had looked at the wrong test output here... 🙃 |
@schlessera Somehow the test is failing. I am not sure about that. May be it's related to what @thrijith was saying...? |
Does the new flag not need to be documented in the function header? |
@grappler Yes, indeed! That will be for the next release then, as I just pushed 2.6.0. :) |
Added
strict
mode for taxonomy list command.Default will be --no-strict
Fixes #181.