Repository navigation
Verifiable receipts for plugins in wshobson/agents? #748
Closed
hheskihoran
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
|
Thanks for asking before building anything. We will not add third party badges to the listings. The marketplace reviews each entry once, at submission time, and the catalog describes what a plugin does. It does not rank plugins or vouch for them. A badge that depends on a vendor service also fails our rule that nothing in the repo routes through a third party when a first party source answers the same question. If you want to measure how well a plugin works, the plugin-eval framework in this repo (docs/plugin-eval.md) is the place to contribute. Closing this one. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi Seth, wshobson/agents is a plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex CLI and Cursor, so I wonder how users judge which agents hold up in real use. I maintain INAM Protocol, which has an MCP server (inam-mcp) for reputation checks and signed receipts of completed work. Would a per-agent badge based on verified receipts be useful in your listings, or would it add noise?
All reactions