Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

package-info.java:29-31: Exploit generic variance for... #1572

Closed
0pdd opened this issue Mar 14, 2021 · 11 comments
Closed

package-info.java:29-31: Exploit generic variance for... #1572

0pdd opened this issue Mar 14, 2021 · 11 comments

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Mar 14, 2021

The puzzle 1533-37aa2e90 from #1533 has to be resolved:

* @todo #1533:30min Exploit generic variance for package org.cactoos.func
* to ensure typing works as best as possible as it is explained in
* #1533 issue.

The puzzle was created by Olivier B. OURA on 13-Mar-21.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Mar 14, 2021

This puzzle inherited milestone 1.0 from issue #1533.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 3, 2021

The job #1572 assigned to @DmitryBarskov/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

@DmitryBarskov
Copy link
Contributor

@victornoel I found something in func package, but it's blocked by scalar issue #1569, can I do it first?

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@DmitryBarskov maybe a good idea is to change just what you need in scalar for moving forward here, and let the rest for #1569. Another idea is to change what is not impacted by scalar (if possible).

Feel free to use whatever means you want to achieve the task, and try not to do too much at once, and all should go well :)

DmitryBarskov added a commit to DmitryBarskov/cactoos that referenced this issue May 8, 2021
DmitryBarskov added a commit to DmitryBarskov/cactoos that referenced this issue May 8, 2021
DmitryBarskov added a commit to DmitryBarskov/cactoos that referenced this issue May 8, 2021
DmitryBarskov added a commit to DmitryBarskov/cactoos that referenced this issue May 8, 2021
DmitryBarskov added a commit to DmitryBarskov/cactoos that referenced this issue May 8, 2021
Co-authored-by: Victor Noël <victor.noel@crazydwarves.org>
DmitryBarskov added a commit to DmitryBarskov/cactoos that referenced this issue May 9, 2021
Co-authored-by: Victor Noël <victor.noel@crazydwarves.org>
DmitryBarskov added a commit to DmitryBarskov/cactoos that referenced this issue May 12, 2021
DmitryBarskov added a commit to DmitryBarskov/cactoos that referenced this issue May 12, 2021
@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented May 13, 2021

The puzzle 1533-37aa2e90 has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented May 13, 2021

@0pdd the puzzle #1613 is still not solved.

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@0crat status

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jun 10, 2021

@0crat status (here)

@victornoel This is what I know about this job in C63314D6Z, as in §32:

@0crat 0crat added the qa label Jun 11, 2021
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jun 11, 2021

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @DmitryBarskov/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@0crat 0crat removed the 0crat/scope label Jun 11, 2021
@sereshqua
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@0crat 0crat added quality/good and removed qa labels Jun 11, 2021
@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Jul 11, 2022

@0pdd the puzzle #unknown is still not solved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants