Why is yeoman.io not made with yeoman

[0x6a68]

i was really a bit shocked, when i realised that the project it self doesn't use it own piece of software. could somebody explain me why there is no use of grunt, bower or even yeoman?

[passy]

Duplicate of #36. But yep, I agree that this is an issue. :)

[0x6a68]

so will be there a generator for jekyll? i think this organization will not be the only one who want to use yeoman and jekyll.

[passy]

There are a few generators for jekyll in development. I don't have an overview right now which one is the most up-to-date.

[robwierzbowski]

I'm biased, but I would say the most up to date Jekyll generator is https://github.com/robwierzbowski/generator-jekyllrb. Yeoman and Jekyll 1.0+, Sass, Coffee, build, all that good stuff.

[sindresorhus]

@robwierzbowski comment on #36 so we don't forget ;)

[0x6a68]

@robwierzbowski right, i am already using your generator and it works like a charm!
only thing that doesn't work built-in, is the automatic username.github.io deployment, but as you mention it in your repo, deployment steps will follow (hopefully soon).

[addyosmani]

Is there a rough timeline for deployment being handled? :)
On 28 May 2013 06:37, "Johannes Troeger" notifications@github.com wrote:

@robwierzbowski https://github.com/robwierzbowski right, i am already
using your generator and it works like a charm!
only thing that doesn't work built-in, is the automatic username.github.iodeployment, but as you mention it in your repo, deployment steps will
follow (hopefully soon).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/61#issuecomment-18532110
.

[0x6a68]

robwierzbowski/generator-jekyllrb#3

[robwierzbowski]

@addyosmani I'm planning on adding deployment options this week. :)

[robwierzbowski]

Opened an issue to discuss deployment options here: robwierzbowski/generator-jekyllrb#10