Skip to content

Conversation

terabytesoftw
Copy link
Member

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw commented Jun 29, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix? ✔️
New feature?
Breaks BC?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Added a workflow for automated mutation testing on pull requests and pushes.
    • Updated configuration files to support mutation testing, including schema references and plugin settings.
    • Added the Infection mutation testing tool and related scripts to development dependencies.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved node movement logic for more accurate boundary adjustments in nested sets.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (f1250a2) to head (7a0c607).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #22   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity        91        91           
===========================================
  Files              2         2           
  Lines            474       474           
===========================================
  Hits             474       474           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 29, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces a GitHub Actions workflow for mutation testing, adds and configures the Infection mutation testing tool in Composer, updates its configuration, switches PHPUnit's schema reference to a local path, and refines a conditional check in the moveNode method of NestedSetsBehavior.php.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/mutation.yml Added a workflow for mutation testing using a reusable Infection workflow and secret management.
composer.json Added Infection to dev dependencies, enabled its plugin, and introduced a "mutation" script.
infection.json5 Added schema reference, reordered sections, introduced phpStan config, and removed mutators section.
phpunit.xml.dist Changed PHPUnit schema reference from remote URL to local vendor path.
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php Modified condition in moveNode method from >= to >.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Infection Tool
    participant Stryker Dashboard

    Developer->>GitHub Actions: Push or PR (excluding docs/config)
    GitHub Actions->>Infection Tool: Run mutation tests (via reusable workflow)
    Infection Tool->>Stryker Dashboard: Report results (using API key)
    Infection Tool-->>GitHub Actions: Return mutation test status
    GitHub Actions-->>Developer: Display results in PR/checks
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug

Poem

In the warren of code, a rabbit hops,
Mutation tests now run in stops and pops.
Infection’s in place, with boundaries set right,
And PHPUnit’s schema is now local, not light.
With a tweak to moveNode, the garden grows neat—
Bugs beware, for this patch is quite the treat! 🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 phpcs (3.7.2)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php

Warning: PHP Startup: Invalid date.timezone value 'UTC', using 'UTC' instead in Unknown on line 0

Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class "Phar" not found in /usr/local/bin/phpcs:3
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /usr/local/bin/phpcs on line 3


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bddddfa and 7a0c607.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (1)

1202-1202: Good bug fix discovered through mutation testing!

Changing the condition from >= to > correctly excludes the case where $leftValue == $value, which represents moving a node to its exact current position. In this scenario, no adjustment to the left and right values should be needed, making this a precise improvement to the nested sets movement logic.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
composer.json (1)

18-18: Version range misses latest Infection 0.30+
The constraint ^0.27|^0.29 excludes 0.30 and future minor releases. Unless there is a known incompatibility, broadening the range keeps you current with fixes:

-"infection/infection": "^0.27|^0.29",
+"infection/infection": "^0.27 || ^0.29 || ^0.30",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5d549e and bf0831f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/mutation.yml (1 hunks)
  • composer.json (2 hunks)
  • infection.json5 (1 hunks)
  • phpunit.xml.dist (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (4)
phpunit.xml.dist (1)

4-4: Local XSD path may break before vendor/ is present – verify availability
Pointing xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation to vendor/phpunit/phpunit/phpunit.xsd improves offline reliability, but the file does not exist until dependencies are installed. Tools that parse/validate the XML (IDE, CI pre-install step, static analysers) will fail to resolve the schema. Consider one of:

-    xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="vendor/phpunit/phpunit/phpunit.xsd"
+    xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="https://schema.phpunit.de/10.2/phpunit.xsd"

or keep the local path but add a small README note / CI step ordering guarantee.

infection.json5 (1)

2-16: Confirm intent after removing explicit mutators block
infection.json5 no longer specifies any mutators section. Infection defaults to @default=true, so behaviour is unchanged unless you previously customised the set. If the removal was accidental, re-add the block; if intentional, no action required.

composer.json (2)

45-45: 👍 Plugin whitelisting looks correct
infection/extension-installer is required when Infection is installed as a plugin; enabling it here prevents Composer warnings.


53-53: 100 % MSI thresholds are brittle – pipeline will fail on first undetected mutant
Requiring --min-msi=100 --min-covered-msi=100 means any line uncovered by tests or any surviving mutant turns the build red, which is hard to sustain on an active codebase. Typical projects start at the current score and raise the bar gradually.

-        "mutation": "./vendor/bin/infection --threads=4 --ignore-msi-with-no-mutations --only-covered --min-msi=100 --min-covered-msi=100",
+        "mutation": "./vendor/bin/infection --threads=4 --ignore-msi-with-no-mutations --only-covered --min-msi=80 --min-covered-msi=85",

Adjust the numbers or pass them via CI so they can evolve.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)

1723-1779: Consider testing actual behavior logic rather than language features.

While this test correctly verifies the null coalescing operator behavior, it doesn't test any real functionality of the NestedSetsBehavior class. The test creates an anonymous class just to test PHP's built-in ?? operator, which seems disconnected from the actual behavior logic.

If this test is targeting specific mutation coverage for null coalescing usage within the actual NestedSetsBehavior implementation, consider:

  1. Testing the actual method in NestedSetsBehavior that uses null coalescing instead of creating an isolated test
  2. Adding a comment explaining which specific behavior method this test is designed to cover for mutation testing
  3. Alternatively, if there's a specific beforeInsertNode method that uses null coalescing, test that method directly with realistic scenarios

This would make the test more meaningful and better integrated with the actual codebase functionality.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf0831f and 3a34701.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
  • GitHub Check: composer-require-checker / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)

1858-1902: Great test for validation parameter handling with minor suggestion.

This test method effectively validates the runValidation parameter behavior in appendTo() using the new strict validation model. The test correctly verifies both validation enforcement and bypass scenarios.

Minor improvement suggestion:
Consider using a different variable name when re-fetching the node from the database at line 1896 to improve code clarity:

-        $invalidNode2 = TreeWithStrictValidation::findOne($invalidNode2->id);
+        $persistedNode = TreeWithStrictValidation::findOne($invalidNode2->id);
 
         self::assertNotNull(
-            $invalidNode2,
-            "Node with ID '{$invalidNode2?->id}' should exist after appending to target node.",
+            $persistedNode,
+            "Node with ID '{$invalidNode2->id}' should exist after appending to target node.",
         );

This makes it clearer that you're testing persistence by re-fetching from the database.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 429c795 and 339f7b0.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/phpstan-config.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/support/model/TreeWithStrictValidation.php (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/phpstan-config.php
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/support/model/TreeWithStrictValidation.php (1)
tests/support/model/Tree.php (1)
  • Tree (17-64)
🪛 PHPMD (2.15.0)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

1790-1790: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\Tree' in method 'testTransactionRollbackOnDeleteWithChildrenFailure'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)


1845-1845: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\Tree' in method 'testTransactionRollbackOnDeleteWithChildrenFailure'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)


1849-1849: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\Tree' in method 'testTransactionRollbackOnDeleteWithChildrenFailure'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)


1853-1853: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\Tree' in method 'testTransactionRollbackOnDeleteWithChildrenFailure'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)


1862-1862: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\Tree' in method 'testAppendToWithRunValidationParameterUsingStrictValidation'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)


1896-1896: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\TreeWithStrictValidation' in method 'testAppendToWithRunValidationParameterUsingStrictValidation'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (14)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/support/model/TreeWithStrictValidation.php (1)

14-24: LGTM! Well-designed test model for validation scenarios.

The TreeWithStrictValidation class is well-implemented with comprehensive validation rules that will be useful for testing validation-related functionality. The custom error messages and multiple validation constraints (required, min length, pattern) provide good coverage for testing edge cases.

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (2)

13-13: LGTM! Correct import addition.

The import statement correctly adds the new TreeWithStrictValidation class for use in the test methods.


1786-1856: Excellent test for transaction rollback verification.

This test method thoroughly validates that transaction rollback works correctly when deleteWithChildren() fails. The test properly:

  • Uses mocking to simulate internal failures
  • Verifies that data integrity is maintained after exceptions
  • Checks both node count and individual node existence
  • Follows good testing practices with clear setup and verification steps

This adds valuable coverage for ensuring data consistency during failed operations.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 30c00b8 and 32d923a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/support/data/test-disorder.xml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/support/data/test-disorder.xml
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (3)
tests/TestCase.php (3)
  • createDatabase (93-127)
  • getDb (40-43)
  • loadFixtureXML (220-237)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (1)
  • children (477-502)
tests/support/model/Tree.php (1)
  • Tree (17-64)
🪛 PHPMD (2.15.0)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

2303-2303: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\Tree' in method 'testChildrenMethodRequiresOrderByForCorrectTreeTraversal'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)

🪛 GitHub Check: phpstan / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

[failure] 2341-2341:
Offset 2 might not exist on array<int, yii\db\ActiveRecord>.


[failure] 2332-2332:
Offset 1 might not exist on array<int, yii\db\ActiveRecord>.


[failure] 2323-2323:
Offset 0 might not exist on array<int, yii\db\ActiveRecord>.

🪛 GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

[failure] 2341-2341:
Offset 2 might not exist on array<int, yii\db\ActiveRecord>.


[failure] 2332-2332:
Offset 1 might not exist on array<int, yii\db\ActiveRecord>.


[failure] 2323-2323:
Offset 0 might not exist on array<int, yii\db\ActiveRecord>.

🪛 GitHub Actions: ecs
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

[error] 2315-2335: PhpCsFixer detected fixable formatting issues related to MethodArgumentSpaceFixer and whitespace. Run 'vendor/bin/ecs check --fix' to apply fixes.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)

2275-2344: LGTM! Important test for nested sets ordering behavior.

This test validates a crucial aspect of nested sets behavior - ensuring that the children() method returns nodes in the correct order by their lft attribute. The test design using a deliberately disordered XML fixture is excellent for verifying that the ORDER BY clause is working correctly.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (2)

78-112: Consider the implications of switching from model methods to raw SQL.

The change from using MultipleTree::makeRoot() to raw SQL inserts bypasses the model's logic and validation. While this approach may provide more predictable behavior for mutation testing, it could miss testing scenarios where the model's makeRoot() method contains important business logic.

Consider adding a comment explaining why raw SQL is preferred here, or verify that makeRoot() doesn't contain critical logic that should be tested through this workflow.

+        // Using raw SQL inserts to ensure predictable data for mutation testing
+        // bypassing model methods that may contain logic subject to mutation
         $command = $this->getDb()->createCommand();

116-116: Test logic appears to verify ID-based ordering rather than tree traversal ordering.

The expected order ['Root B', 'Root A', 'Root C'] corresponds to ID order [5, 10, 15], which suggests the test is verifying that roots are returned ordered by ID. However, the test name suggests it's about "OrderBy for correct tree traversal."

Consider updating the test name or adding a comment to clarify what ordering behavior is being tested:

-    public function testRootsMethodRequiresOrderByForCorrectTreeTraversal(): void
+    public function testRootsMethodReturnsRootsOrderedById(): void

Or add a clarifying comment:

+        // Verify that roots() method returns roots ordered by ID (default ordering)
         $expectedOrderById = ['Root B', 'Root A', 'Root C'];
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 32d923a and 674e9de.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (18)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpstan / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpstan / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: composer-require-checker / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (2)

118-118: LGTM! Count assertion updated correctly.

The assertion correctly reflects the change from 4 to 3 root nodes.


83-89: Confirmed unique IDs for multiple_tree entries

  • The manual inserts use IDs 10, 5, and 15 only for the multiple_tree table in this test.
  • The fixture files loaded here for multiple_tree (test-roots-multiple-tree-query.php) use IDs 23 and 45—no overlap with 5, 10, or 15.
  • Other occurrences of id => 5 refer to the single-tree tree table, not multiple_tree.

No conflicts with sequences or existing fixtures detected.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 674e9de and e816235.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/NestedSetsQueryBehavior.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/NestedSetsQueryBehavior.php (1)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (1)
  • getOwner (1396-1403)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (13)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/NestedSetsQueryBehavior.php (2)

89-89: LGTM! Comment accurately reflects the new ordering behavior.

The updated comment correctly describes the new ordering logic that prioritizes tree attribute (when enabled) followed by left attribute, which is consistent with the implementation below.


109-113: Excellent consistency improvement with the leaves() method.

The ordering logic now follows the exact same pattern as the leaves() method (lines 67-71), which provides better consistency across the behavior. The prioritization of tree attribute over left attribute makes sense for multi-tree scenarios in nested sets.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw deleted the feat-mini-1 branch July 1, 2025 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants