refactor: Simplify deleteWithChildren method by removing transaction handling.
#49
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@terabytesoftw has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 3 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant NestedSetsBehavior
Caller->>NestedSetsBehavior: deleteWithChildren()
NestedSetsBehavior->>NestedSetsBehavior: deleteWithChildrenInternal()
NestedSetsBehavior-->>Caller: Result (affected rows)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #49 +/- ##
===========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
+ Complexity 131 129 -2
===========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 528 518 -10
===========================================
- Hits 528 518 -10 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
… `insertBefore`, `makeRoot`, and `prependTo` methods.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR refactors the deletion of nodes with children by removing manual transaction handling from the deleteWithChildren method, cleans up related tests, and adds documentation notes to clarify automatic transaction support.
- Removed manual transaction wrapper in
deleteWithChildren - Deleted tests covering manual transaction and exception propagation for node deletion
- Added DocBlock notes for automatic transaction handling in several tree operations
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php | Removed tests asserting manual transaction behavior and exception propagation |
| src/NestedSetsBehavior.php | Simplified deleteWithChildren to call internal logic directly and updated docs |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:537
- Consider adding a DocBlock note for
deleteWithChildrento clarify that transaction handling is now managed by ActiveRecord, similar to other methods in this class.
public function deleteWithChildren(): bool|int
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php:1432
- Add a positive test case for
deleteWithChildrento verify it returns the correct number of affected rows and updates the tree structure as expected without manual transactions.
public function testReturnFalseWhenDeleteWithChildrenIsAbortedByBeforeDelete(): void
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Tests