You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For this question, I am assuming Ray is playing according to Chinese rule (area scoring). Please correct me if I am wrong.
There is not 100% consensus regarding area scoring and handicap games, but it is usual to add the number of handicap stones to the points made by White. So that White score, after removing all dead stones, will be the sum of :
the number of empty points surrounded by white stones only
the number of living white stones on the board
the value of komi (usually 0.5 point for handicap game)
Now, even without accounting for the handicap stone, it should be B+121.5 and not B+132.5 which seems to indicate that Ray does not accound neither for handicap (<- this might be ok depending on rule set) neither for komi.
Hi,
For this question, I am assuming Ray is playing according to Chinese rule (area scoring). Please correct me if I am wrong.
There is not 100% consensus regarding area scoring and handicap games, but it is usual to add the number of handicap stones to the points made by White. So that White score, after removing all dead stones, will be the sum of :
For instance, Leela Zero accounts for it:
https://github.com/gcp/leela-zero/blob/5958e02cf539d42ee20704b664043036d5c3c18b/src/FastState.cpp#L150
And one can make the assumption that Leela does the same.
GNU Go does the same as well (http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnugo.git/tree/engine/aftermath.c#n1185).
From what I can read in the code; Ray does not account for it:
Ray/src/Gtp.cpp
Line 520 in e5b2cad
Could you confirm?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: