-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Fix cloning from GCS #1176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fix cloning from GCS #1176
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f842529
Merge pull request #1 from zalando/master
sagor999 351989a
Fix clone from gcs
sagor999 266c6e5
pass google credentials env var if using GS bucket
sagor999 ac4eb35
remove requirement for timezone as GCS returns timestamp in local tim…
sagor999 1390af0
Revert "remove requirement for timezone as GCS returns timestamp in l…
sagor999 7c50f15
update GCS documentation
sagor999 6742511
Merge branch 'improve_gcs_docs' into fix_clone_from_gcs
sagor999 1f7bcc7
remove sentence about logical backups
sagor999 a874151
reword pod environment configmap section
sagor999 79e73dd
fix documentation
sagor999 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the documentation part needs to be formulated differently.
Title of the section should include "GCS" to indicate it's not just general configmap.
The operator doesn't have any preferences or suggestions about which method to use, so "we want to use WAL-G" need to be omitted. Instead it could be formulated as "To make operator work with GCS do the following: ...".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this paragraph is part of a bigger section about GCP so title is fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, then the title part is fine. But I would still ask to avoid indirect suggestions about using WAL-G (it could be a note though). Other than that looks good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@erthalion I re-worded that section based on your feedback. I left a note as to why we are using WAL-G instead of WAL-E, so that end-user understands the reasoning, instead of just using "magical" configmap. Let me know if you agree with the changes.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sagor999 Yes, looks good, thanks. Do you have any references/docs we can also add to make the claim about WAL-G suited better for GCS look more respectable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@erthalion valid point. I looked it up, and it seems like it is possible to make WAL-E work with GCS. So I have re-worded that phrase.