be more permissive with standbys #842
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
FxKu
requested review from
CyberDem0n,
Jan-M,
RafiaSabih,
avaczi,
erthalion and
sdudoladov
as code owners
sdudoladov
reviewed
Feb 24, 2020
|
👍 |
1 similar comment
|
👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If somebody is already running a standby with more than one instance, the operator should not terminate the replicas, but give a warning instead that we recommend
1.The docs on standby clusters should also be more clear now on what is possible and how to set it up.