Rust Parsing Benchmarks

This repo tries to assess Rust parsing performance.

crate	parser type	action code	integration	input type	precedence climbing	parameterized rules	streaming input
chumsky	combinators	in source	library	&str	?	?	?
combine	combinators	in source	library	&str	?	?	?
lalrpop	LR(1)	in grammar	build script	&str	No	Yes	No
nom	combinators	in source	library	&[u8], custom	No	Yes	Yes
peg	PEG	in grammar	proc macro (block)	&str, &[T], custom	Yes	Yes	No
pest	PEG	external	proc macro (file)	&str	Yes	No	No
pom	combinators	in source	library	&str	?	?	?
winnow	combinators	in source	library	&str, &[T], custom	No	Yes	Yes
yap	combinators	in source	library	&str, &[T], custom	No	Yes	?

Results

Name	Overhead (release)	Build (debug)	Parse (release)	Downloads	Version
null	0 KiB	227ms	24ms	-	-
chumsky	672 KiB	7s	1s		v0.3.0
combine	223 KiB	4s	880ms		v3.8.1
lalrpop	1,607 KiB	12s	2s		v0.20.0
nom	141 KiB	2s	932ms		v7.1.3
peg	27 KiB	2s	invalid		v0.8.1
pest	157 KiB	4s	844ms		v2.7.3
pom	187 KiB	2s	2s		v3.3.0
winnow	121 KiB	2s	729ms		v0.5.15
yap	89 KiB	479ms	765ms		v0.10.0

System: Linux 5.4.0-124-generic (x86_64) w/ -j 8

Note:

• For more "Parse (release)" comparisons, see parser_benchmarks
• Parsers have not been validated and might have differing levels of quality (#5)

Running the Benchmarks

$ ./bench.py
$ ./format.py