Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: For multipart bodies the content CRLF after the last boundary should be ignored and not be mandatory #2781

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

fix: For multipart bodies the content CRLF after the last boundary should be ignored and not be mandatory #2781

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

seakayone
Copy link
Contributor

@seakayone seakayone commented Apr 18, 2024 •
edited
Loading

see #2411

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Apr 18, 2024 •
edited
Loading

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@seakayone seakayone changed the title Add failing test case fix: For multipart bodies the content after the last boundary should be ignored and a CRLF not be mandatory Apr 18, 2024
@seakayone seakayone changed the title fix: For multipart bodies the content after the last boundary should be ignored and a CRLF not be mandatory fix: For multipart bodies the content CRLF after the last boundary should be ignored and not be mandatory Apr 18, 2024
@seakayone seakayone closed this May 21, 2024
@seakayone seakayone deleted the fix/ignore-clrf-after-last-multipart-boundary branch May 21, 2024 07:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jdegoes jdegoes Awaiting requested review from jdegoes jdegoes will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review jdegoes is a code owner

@vigoo vigoo Awaiting requested review from vigoo vigoo will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review vigoo is a code owner

@987Nabil 987Nabil Awaiting requested review from 987Nabil 987Nabil will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review 987Nabil is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@seakayone @CLAassistant