Skip to content

Conversation

kjohn-msft
Copy link
Collaborator

Potential fix for https://github.com/Azure/LinuxPatchExtension/security/code-scanning/1

To fix the issue, we will add a permissions block at the root of the workflow file. This block will define the minimal permissions required for the workflow to function correctly. Based on the workflow's actions, it primarily needs read access to repository contents and write access to pull requests (if applicable). For uploading coverage reports, no additional permissions are required as the codecov-action uses the CODECOV_TOKEN secret.

The permissions block will be added at the root level to apply to all jobs in the workflow. If any job requires different permissions, we can override them within the specific job.


Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Remediating automated code scanning alert.

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.77%. Comparing base (651c97b) to head (1b59182).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #327   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.77%   93.77%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines       17924    17924           
=======================================
  Hits        16809    16809           
  Misses       1115     1115           
Flag Coverage Δ
python27 93.77% <ø> (ø)
python312 93.77% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kjohn-msft kjohn-msft added the engg. hygiene Engineering hygiene related label Jun 30, 2025
@kjohn-msft kjohn-msft changed the title Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain permissions Engg. hygiene: Explicit Codecov workflow permissions Jun 30, 2025
@kjohn-msft kjohn-msft marked this pull request as ready for review June 30, 2025 18:47
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 30, 2025 18:47
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds explicit workflow permissions to address a security code scanning issue by restricting the default permissions of the Codecov workflow.

  • Added a "permissions" block with read access to repository contents.
  • Updates the overall security posture of the CI workflow.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.github/workflows/ci.yml:2

  • Consider whether the workflow should also include write access for pull requests, as mentioned in the PR description, or add a clarifying comment explaining why only 'contents: read' is sufficient.
permissions:

@kjohn-msft kjohn-msft enabled auto-merge (squash) June 30, 2025 18:47
@kjohn-msft kjohn-msft merged commit 4e31176 into master Jul 1, 2025
8 checks passed
@kjohn-msft kjohn-msft deleted the kjohn-alert-autofix branch July 1, 2025 15:49
rane-rajasi added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2025
Release includes:

- [AzL3Tdnf] Refactoring TDNF Package Manager separating Azure Linux
specializations in it's own implementation
[331](#331)
- [AzL3Tdnf] Renaming TdnfPackageManager to AzL3PackageManager
[332](#332)
- Feature: Azure Linux 3.0: Enhanced Support
[318](#318)
- Engg. hygiene: Explicit Codecov workflow permissions
[327](#327)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
engg. hygiene Engineering hygiene related
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants