Feat backend copy project template #75
Conversation
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Introduced a new template for React applications using TypeScript and Vite, including essential setup files. - Added a main HTML entry point for the application. - Configured ESLint for improved code quality and best practices in TypeScript and React environments. - **Documentation** - Added a README file outlining setup instructions and recommended configurations for the template. - **Configuration** - New TypeScript and Vite configuration files created to optimize the development environment. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
backend/src/build-system/handlers/project-init.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier". (The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new test suite for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
…ojectTemplate test
…om/Sma1lboy/GeneratorAI into feat_backend_copy_project_template
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/src/config/common-path.ts (1)
Path traversal protection needs immediate implementation
The codebase shows extensive file system operations without proper path traversal protection. Key findings:
- Multiple instances of unchecked
path.join()operations inbackend/src/config/common-path.ts- Direct file operations (
readFile,writeFile,unlink) without path validation- Only basic path normalization through
normalize-pathpackage, which doesn't prevent path traversalRequired actions:
- Implement path sanitization before any file system operation
- Add validation to prevent directory traversal attacks (e.g.,
../sequences)- Apply these protections to all exported path-handling functions in
common-path.tsExample vulnerable paths:
getTemplatePath(templateName): Direct path joining without validationgetConfigPath(configName): No sanitization of config namegetModelPath(modelName): Unchecked model name parameter🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
20-21: Address the TODO comment about path traversal protectionThe existing comment "We need path traverse Protection" is particularly relevant given the new template functionality. This should be addressed comprehensively across all path-handling functions.
Consider:
- Implementing a centralized path validation utility
- Adding path traversal protection to all exported functions
- Creating a security policy document for file system operations
Let's analyze the current path handling across the codebase:
Let me analyze the path handling patterns revealed by our search. The results show extensive use of
path.join()and file operations across the codebase, particularly inbackend/src/config/common-path.tsand related files. Let me verify if there are any path sanitization utilities already in place.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze path handling patterns across the codebase # Find all path manipulation instances rg -n "path\.(join|resolve|normalize)" --type ts # Find potential path traversal vulnerabilities ast-grep --pattern 'path.join($$$)' # Check for direct file system operations rg -n "(readFile|writeFile|readdir|unlink)" --type tsLength of output: 11444
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for any existing path sanitization or validation rg -n "(sanitize|validate|normalize).*path" --type ts -A 3 # Check for any security-related utilities rg -n "security.*util" --type ts # Look for path normalization implementations ast-grep --pattern 'function $_(path: string) { $$$ }'Length of output: 3097
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts (2)
41-48: Improve template validation robustness.The template existence check has potential issues:
- Race condition between check and usage
- No explicit return type annotation
Consider this enhancement:
- const templateExists = await fs - .access(templatePath) - .then(() => true) - .catch(() => false); - if (!templateExists) { - throw new Error(`Template path does not exist: ${templatePath}`); + const templateExists: boolean = await fs + .stat(templatePath) + .then((stats) => stats.isDirectory()) + .catch(() => false); + if (!templateExists) { + throw new Error(`Invalid template path or not a directory: ${templatePath}`); }
53-57: Consider atomic copy operation.The current implementation logs before the copy operation, which could be misleading if the copy fails.
Consider this approach:
- // Copy the template to the destination - logger.log( - `Copying template from ${templatePath} to ${destinationPath}...`, - ); - await fs.copy(templatePath, destinationPath); + // Ensure atomic copy operation + await fs.copy(templatePath, destinationPath, { errorOnExist: true }); + logger.log(`Template copied successfully to ${destinationPath}`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.copy-project-template.spec.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/project-init.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/config/common-path.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/config/common-path.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/src/config/common-path.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/src/config/common-path.ts (1)
10-12:
Add validation and security measures to template path handling
The template path implementation lacks important validation and security measures:
- No validation that the template directory exists
- No sanitization or validation of the template name parameter
- Potential path traversal vulnerability
Consider implementing these security measures:
-export const TEMPLATE_PATH = path.join(WORKSPACE_ROOT, 'backend/template');
-export const getTemplatePath = (templateName: string): string =>
- path.join(TEMPLATE_PATH, templateName);
+export const TEMPLATE_PATH = ensureDir(path.join(WORKSPACE_ROOT, 'backend/template'));
+
+const VALID_TEMPLATES = ['template-backend', 'template-frontend'] as const;
+type TemplateName = typeof VALID_TEMPLATES[number];
+
+export const getTemplatePath = (templateName: string): string => {
+ // Validate template name
+ if (!VALID_TEMPLATES.includes(templateName as TemplateName)) {
+ throw new Error(`Invalid template name: ${templateName}`);
+ }
+
+ // Prevent path traversal by normalizing and checking the resolved path
+ const templatePath = path.normalize(path.join(TEMPLATE_PATH, templateName));
+ if (!templatePath.startsWith(TEMPLATE_PATH)) {
+ throw new Error('Path traversal detected');
+ }
+
+ if (!existsSync(templatePath)) {
+ throw new Error(`Template not found: ${templateName}`);
+ }
+
+ return templatePath;
+};Let's verify the template directory structure:
| describe('Copy Project Template', () => { | ||
| it('should copy the template to the specified UUID folder', async () => { | ||
| const templatePath = getTemplatePath('template-backend'); | ||
| const projectUUID = uuidv4(); | ||
|
|
||
| Logger.log('template-path:', templatePath); | ||
| const projectPath = await copyProjectTemplate(templatePath, projectUUID); | ||
| expect(await fs.access(projectPath)).toBeUndefined(); // Project folder exists | ||
| await fs.rm(projectPath, { recursive: true, force: true }); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage with additional test cases.
The current test suite only covers the happy path. Consider adding test cases for:
- Invalid template paths
- File system permission errors
- Template content validation
Here's a suggested enhancement:
describe('Copy Project Template', () => {
+ let projectPath: string;
+
+ afterEach(async () => {
+ if (projectPath) {
+ await fs.rm(projectPath, { recursive: true, force: true });
+ }
+ });
+
it('should copy the template to the specified UUID folder', async () => {
const templatePath = getTemplatePath('template-backend');
const projectUUID = uuidv4();
- Logger.log('template-path:', templatePath);
- const projectPath = await copyProjectTemplate(templatePath, projectUUID);
+ projectPath = await copyProjectTemplate(templatePath, projectUUID);
expect(await fs.access(projectPath)).toBeUndefined(); // Project folder exists
- await fs.rm(projectPath, { recursive: true, force: true });
+
+ // Validate template content
+ const files = await fs.readdir(projectPath);
+ expect(files.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
+
+ it('should throw error for invalid template path', async () => {
+ const invalidPath = '/invalid/path';
+ const projectUUID = uuidv4();
+
+ await expect(copyProjectTemplate(invalidPath, projectUUID))
+ .rejects
+ .toThrow('Template path does not exist');
+ });
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| describe('Copy Project Template', () => { | |
| it('should copy the template to the specified UUID folder', async () => { | |
| const templatePath = getTemplatePath('template-backend'); | |
| const projectUUID = uuidv4(); | |
| Logger.log('template-path:', templatePath); | |
| const projectPath = await copyProjectTemplate(templatePath, projectUUID); | |
| expect(await fs.access(projectPath)).toBeUndefined(); // Project folder exists | |
| await fs.rm(projectPath, { recursive: true, force: true }); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| describe('Copy Project Template', () => { | |
| let projectPath: string; | |
| afterEach(async () => { | |
| if (projectPath) { | |
| await fs.rm(projectPath, { recursive: true, force: true }); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| it('should copy the template to the specified UUID folder', async () => { | |
| const templatePath = getTemplatePath('template-backend'); | |
| const projectUUID = uuidv4(); | |
| projectPath = await copyProjectTemplate(templatePath, projectUUID); | |
| expect(await fs.access(projectPath)).toBeUndefined(); // Project folder exists | |
| // Validate template content | |
| const files = await fs.readdir(projectPath); | |
| expect(files.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); | |
| }); | |
| it('should throw error for invalid template path', async () => { | |
| const invalidPath = '/invalid/path'; | |
| const projectUUID = uuidv4(); | |
| await expect(copyProjectTemplate(invalidPath, projectUUID)) | |
| .rejects | |
| .toThrow('Template path does not exist'); | |
| }); | |
| }); |
| //frontend | ||
| const frontendTemplatePath = getTemplatePath('react-ts'); | ||
| // backend | ||
| const backendTemplatePath = getTemplatePath('template-backend'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Frontend template path is retrieved but unused.
The code retrieves the frontend template path but doesn't use it. Either implement the frontend template copying or remove the unused code.
|
|
||
| const result = { | ||
| projectName: 'online shoping', | ||
| descreption: 'sell products', | ||
| Platform: 'Web', | ||
| path: '/path/to/project', | ||
| }; | ||
| context.setGlobalContext('projectConfig', result); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update hardcoded project configuration.
The result object contains hardcoded values and a typo in 'descreption'. Consider:
- Using dynamic values from context or parameters
- Including the created project paths
- Fixing the typo in 'description'
Here's a suggested fix:
const result = {
- projectName: 'online shoping',
- descreption: 'sell products',
- Platform: 'Web',
- path: '/path/to/project',
+ projectName: context.getConfig('projectName'),
+ description: context.getConfig('description'),
+ platform: context.getConfig('platform'),
+ backendPath: backendProjectPath,
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| export async function copyProjectTemplate( | ||
| templatePath: string, | ||
| projectUUID: string, | ||
| ): Promise<string> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add UUID format validation.
The function should validate the projectUUID format before using it to create paths.
Add validation at the start of the function:
export async function copyProjectTemplate(
templatePath: string,
projectUUID: string,
): Promise<string> {
+ const uuidRegex = /^[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-4[0-9a-f]{3}-[89ab][0-9a-f]{3}-[0-9a-f]{12}$/i;
+ if (!uuidRegex.test(projectUUID)) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid UUID format');
+ }
try {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export async function copyProjectTemplate( | |
| templatePath: string, | |
| projectUUID: string, | |
| ): Promise<string> { | |
| export async function copyProjectTemplate( | |
| templatePath: string, | |
| projectUUID: string, | |
| ): Promise<string> { | |
| const uuidRegex = /^[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-4[0-9a-f]{3}-[89ab][0-9a-f]{3}-[0-9a-f]{12}$/i; | |
| if (!uuidRegex.test(projectUUID)) { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid UUID format'); | |
| } |
| // TODO: hack way to get the root directory of the workspace | ||
| const WORKSPACE_ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '../../../'); | ||
| const ROOT_DIR = path.join(WORKSPACE_ROOT, `.${APP_NAME}`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve workspace root resolution implementation
The current implementation has several concerns:
- The TODO comment indicates this is a temporary solution without explaining why or providing a better alternative
- Using
__dirnamewith relative path navigation (../../../) is fragile and could break if the directory structure changes - No validation is performed to ensure the resolved workspace root is valid
Consider:
- Using environment variables or configuration files to define the workspace root
- Adding validation to ensure the resolved path exists and has the expected structure
- Documenting the rationale behind the current approach and the intended permanent solution
-// TODO: hack way to get the root directory of the workspace
-const WORKSPACE_ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '../../../');
+// TODO(high): Replace with configuration-based workspace root resolution
+// Current limitation: Using relative path resolution which is fragile
+const WORKSPACE_ROOT = process.env.WORKSPACE_ROOT || path.resolve(__dirname, '../../../');
+if (!existsSync(WORKSPACE_ROOT)) {
+ throw new Error(`Invalid workspace root: ${WORKSPACE_ROOT}`);
+}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor