Skip to content

Conversation

ZHallen122
Copy link
Collaborator

@ZHallen122 ZHallen122 commented Dec 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new test suite for path utilities, validating various path-related functionalities.
    • Added a utility function to save generated code to a specified file path.
    • Introduced a utility function to extract JSON from Markdown content.
    • Registered the FileGeneratorHandler for file generation processes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling for file writing and JSON extraction processes.
  • Chores

    • Updated import statements for utility modules to improve code organization.
    • Removed deprecated utility class related to JSON extraction.
    • Modified import style for path and os modules in the common-path configuration.

Sma1lboy and others added 11 commits November 28, 2024 10:07
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

## Release Notes

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new template for React applications using TypeScript and
Vite, including essential setup files.
	- Added a main HTML entry point for the application.
- Configured ESLint for improved code quality and best practices in
TypeScript and React environments.

- **Documentation**
- Added a README file outlining setup instructions and recommended
configurations for the template.

- **Configuration**
- New TypeScript and Vite configuration files created to optimize the
development environment.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
@ZHallen122 ZHallen122 requested a review from Sma1lboy December 16, 2024 04:02
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 eslint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-generate/index.ts

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier".

(The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".)

It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following:

npm install eslint-plugin-prettier@latest --save-dev

The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js".

If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces comprehensive changes to the build system's utility functions and testing infrastructure. The modifications focus on enhancing path management, file generation, and context handling. Key updates include adding a new test suite for path utilities, introducing a project UUID in the build context, updating file utility functions, and refactoring import statements across multiple files. The changes aim to improve code organization, error handling, and project-specific tracking in the build system.

Changes

File Change Summary
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create-and-path.spec.ts Added new test suite for path utilities with multiple test cases validating directory and path-related functions
backend/src/build-system/context.ts Added projectUUID to GlobalDataKeys and initialized UUID in BuilderContext constructor
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts Updated import from FileUtil to extractJsonFromMarkdown in strings
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-generate/index.ts Updated import for JSON extraction from FileUtil to extractJsonFromMarkdown in strings, added getProjectPath and normalizePath imports
backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts Added new saveGeneratedCode utility function for file saving
backend/src/build-system/utils/strings.ts Added extractJsonFromMarkdown utility function
backend/src/build-system/utils/util.ts Removed FileUtil class and extractJsonFromMarkdown method
backend/src/config/common-path.ts Updated import statements for path and os modules
backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts Added FileGeneratorHandler to builtInHandlers in BuildHandlerManager

Suggested labels

enhancement

Suggested reviewers

  • Sma1lboy

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Build System Ballad 🛠️
Paths and UUIDs dance with glee,
Utilities refactored, now set free!
From markdown's depths, JSON we'll parse,
With testing vigor, we'll leave no trace.
Code generation, a hoppy delight! 🚀

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Sma1lboy Sma1lboy marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2024 06:08
@Sma1lboy Sma1lboy requested a review from NarwhalChen December 16, 2024 06:08
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-generate/index.ts (2)

Line range hint 19-21: Fix empty projectSrcPath initialization

Initializing projectSrcPath as an empty string could lead to issues with file generation. Consider retrieving the path from the context or configuration.

-    // change here
-    const projectSrcPath = '';
+    const projectSrcPath = context.getData('projectSrcPath') || path.join(process.cwd(), 'src');
     this.generateFiles(JSON.stringify(fileArch, null, 2), projectSrcPath);

Line range hint 142-147: Enhance error handling in resolveDependency

The dependency resolution could be more robust with additional error handling and validation.

   private resolveDependency(currentFile: string, dependency: string): string {
+    if (!currentFile || !dependency) {
+      throw new Error('Invalid arguments: currentFile and dependency must be provided');
+    }
+
     const currentDir = path.dirname(currentFile);
 
     // Check if the dependency is a file with an extension
     const hasExtension = path.extname(dependency).length > 0;
 
+    // Validate dependency path
+    if (dependency.includes('..')) {
+      throw new Error('Security: Traversal outside project directory is not allowed');
+    }
+
     // If the dependency doesn't have an extension and is not CSS/JS, assume it's a TypeScript file
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
backend/src/build-system/utils/strings.ts (2)

12-14: Strengthen the regex pattern

The current regex pattern could be more robust:

  1. It's not anchored to word boundaries
  2. It might match nested tags incorrectly
-  const jsonMatch = /<GENERATEDCODE>([\s\S]*?)<\/GENERATEDCODE>/m.exec(
+  const jsonMatch = /\b<GENERATEDCODE>\s*([\s\S]*?)\s*<\/GENERATEDCODE>\b/m.exec(
     markdownContent,
   );

22-25: Enhance error logging

The error message could include more context about the JSON content that failed to parse.

   } catch (error) {
-    logger.error('Invalid JSON format in the Markdown content: ' + error);
+    logger.error(
+      'Invalid JSON format in the Markdown content:\n' +
+      `Content: ${jsonMatch[1].substring(0, 100)}...\n` +
+      `Error: ${error}`
+    );
     return null;
   }
backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts (1)

18-26: Enhance error handling and logging

The error handling could be more specific and informative.

   try {
     // fs-extra's outputFile creates all directories if they don't exist
     await fs.outputFile(filePath, content, 'utf8');
     return filePath;
   } catch (error) {
-    logger.error('Error saving generated code:', error);
+    const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
+    logger.error(
+      `Failed to save generated code to ${filePath}:\n` +
+      `Error: ${errorMessage}`
+    );
     throw error;
   }
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create-and-path.spec.ts (1)

56-62: Improve test assertions

The test could be more comprehensive in its assertions.

   it('should create and return the root directory', async () => {
     const rootDir = pathUtil.getRootDir();
 
     await generateAndSaveCode();
     expect(rootDir).toBe(ROOT_DIR);
     expect(existsSync(ROOT_DIR)).toBe(true);
+    expect(existsSync(path.join(ROOT_DIR, 'generated'))).toBe(true);
+    expect(existsSync(path.join(ROOT_DIR, 'generated', 'example.controller.ts'))).toBe(true);
   });
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts (2)

4-4: Consider implementing the TODO for page-by-page analysis

The TODO comment indicates a planned feature for page-by-page analysis. This could enhance the architecture document generation process.

Would you like me to help create a detailed implementation plan or open a GitHub issue to track this enhancement?


Line range hint 83-107: Consider enhancing file path validation

The current validation is good but could be strengthened by:

  1. Adding validation for maximum path length
  2. Checking for reserved filenames on different platforms
  3. Validating against common security patterns
 private validateJsonData(jsonData: {
   files: Record<string, { dependsOn: string[] }>;
 }): boolean {
   const validPathRegex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9_\-/.]+$/;
+  const MAX_PATH_LENGTH = 255;
+  const RESERVED_NAMES = new Set(['CON', 'PRN', 'AUX', 'NUL', 'COM1']);
+
   for (const [file, details] of Object.entries(jsonData.files)) {
+    // Check path length
+    if (file.length > MAX_PATH_LENGTH) {
+      this.logger.error(`File path exceeds maximum length: ${file}`);
+      return false;
+    }
+
+    // Check for reserved names
+    const baseName = file.split('/').pop()?.split('.')[0].toUpperCase();
+    if (baseName && RESERVED_NAMES.has(baseName)) {
+      this.logger.error(`File name uses reserved name: ${file}`);
+      return false;
+    }
+
     // Validate the file path
     if (!validPathRegex.test(file)) {
backend/src/build-system/context.ts (1)

14-18: Consider adding UUID format validation

The GlobalDataKeys type now includes projectUUID, but there's no validation to ensure the UUID format is correct when retrieved.

 export type GlobalDataKeys =
   | 'projectName'
   | 'description'
   | 'platform'
   | 'projectUUID';
+
+// Add UUID validation helper
+const isValidUUID = (uuid: string): boolean => {
+  const uuidRegex = /^[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-4[0-9a-f]{3}-[89ab][0-9a-f]{3}-[0-9a-f]{12}$/i;
+  return uuidRegex.test(uuid);
+};
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-generate/index.ts (1)

Line range hint 165-181: Add retry mechanism for file creation

The file creation process could benefit from a retry mechanism to handle temporary filesystem issues.

   private async createFile(filePath: string): Promise<void> {
     const dir = path.dirname(filePath);
 
+    const maxRetries = 3;
+    let retryCount = 0;
+
+    while (retryCount < maxRetries) {
+      try {
         // Ensure the directory exists
         await fs.mkdir(dir, { recursive: true });
 
         // Create the file with a placeholder content
         const content = `// Generated file: ${path.basename(filePath)}`;
         await fs.writeFile(filePath, content, 'utf8');
 
         this.logger.log(`File created: ${filePath}`);
+        return;
+      } catch (error) {
+        retryCount++;
+        if (retryCount === maxRetries) throw error;
+        await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000 * retryCount));
+      }
+    }
   }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 471e9d2 and 81a6b06.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create-and-path.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/build-system/context.ts (2 hunks)
  • backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-generate/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/build-system/utils/strings.ts (1 hunks)
  • backend/src/build-system/utils/util.ts (0 hunks)
  • backend/src/config/common-path.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • backend/src/build-system/utils/util.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • backend/src/config/common-path.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts (1)

5-5: Verify the behavior of moved FileUtil import

The FileUtil import has been moved from 'util' to 'strings'. Ensure that the extractJsonFromMarkdown function maintains the same behavior in its new location.

✅ Verification successful

The results show that the extractJsonFromMarkdown function maintains identical core functionality in both locations:

  1. Same function signature and return type
  2. Same regex pattern to extract JSON between <GENERATEDCODE> tags
  3. Same error handling and return behavior

The only minor difference is the error logging: old version uses FileUtil.logger while new version uses logger directly, which is a common refactoring pattern when moving functions out of classes.

Import change is safe to use

The FileUtil.extractJsonFromMarkdown function has been successfully moved to the strings utility file with identical core behavior maintained. The minor logger reference change doesn't impact the function's output.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the implementation of extractJsonFromMarkdown between old and new locations
# Note: Using git show to view the old implementation

# Get the old implementation
git show HEAD^:backend/src/build-system/utils/util.ts | rg -A 10 'extractJsonFromMarkdown'

# Get the new implementation
rg -A 10 'extractJsonFromMarkdown' backend/src/build-system/utils/strings.ts

Length of output: 851

backend/src/build-system/context.ts (1)

46-48: Verify UUID persistence across builds

The UUID is initialized in the constructor, but we should verify that it persists across different build stages and remains consistent throughout the project lifecycle.

✅ Verification successful

UUID is correctly managed within build context lifecycle

The projectUUID is stored in memory within the BuilderContext instance's private data object and is appropriately scoped to the build lifecycle. The implementation shows that:

  • The UUID is initialized in the constructor and stored via setData
  • It's accessible throughout the build process via getData
  • The context is maintained for the duration of the build sequence
  • The UUID is not required to persist across different build instances as each build context creates its own unique identifier

This is the correct implementation pattern for a build-scoped identifier.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for UUID persistence implementation
# Look for storage or caching of the UUID

# Search for UUID usage
rg -l "projectUUID" --type ts

# Check for persistence mechanisms
rg -l "persist.*UUID|save.*UUID|store.*UUID" --type ts

Length of output: 122


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the context usage and persistence mechanisms more thoroughly

# Check the implementation of setData and how projectUUID is used
ast-grep --pattern 'setData($_,$_)' 

# Look for any getData calls that might retrieve projectUUID
ast-grep --pattern 'getData($_)'

# Check the full context class implementation
rg -A 5 -B 5 "class.*Context" --type ts

# Look for any serialization or state management of Context
rg -A 3 "serialize|deserialize|save|load|state" --type ts

Length of output: 52282


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the BuilderContext class implementation more thoroughly

# Check the full implementation of BuilderContext class
ast-grep --pattern 'class BuilderContext {
  $$$
}'

# Look for getData implementation to understand how projectUUID is retrieved
ast-grep --pattern 'getData($_) {
  $$$
}'

# Check for any persistence mechanisms in the build system
rg -A 5 "class.*BuilderContext|setData|getData" backend/src/build-system/context.ts

Length of output: 8421

Comment on lines +15 to +18
if (!jsonMatch) {
logger.error('No JSON found in the provided Markdown content.');
return null;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add input validation

The function should validate the input parameter before processing.

+  if (!markdownContent || typeof markdownContent !== 'string') {
+    logger.error('Invalid input: markdownContent must be a non-empty string');
+    return null;
+  }
   if (!jsonMatch) {
     logger.error('No JSON found in the provided Markdown content.');
     return null;
   }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if (!jsonMatch) {
logger.error('No JSON found in the provided Markdown content.');
return null;
}
if (!markdownContent || typeof markdownContent !== 'string') {
logger.error('Invalid input: markdownContent must be a non-empty string');
return null;
}
if (!jsonMatch) {
logger.error('No JSON found in the provided Markdown content.');
return null;
}

Comment on lines +9 to +11
export function extractJsonFromMarkdown(markdownContent: string): {
files: Record<string, { dependsOn: string[] }>;
} {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix return type to match implementation

The return type should include null since the function can return null in error cases.

-export function extractJsonFromMarkdown(markdownContent: string): {
-  files: Record<string, { dependsOn: string[] }>;
+export function extractJsonFromMarkdown(markdownContent: string): {
+  files: Record<string, { dependsOn: string[] }>;
+} | null {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
export function extractJsonFromMarkdown(markdownContent: string): {
files: Record<string, { dependsOn: string[] }>;
} {
export function extractJsonFromMarkdown(markdownContent: string): {
files: Record<string, { dependsOn: string[] }>;
} | null {

Comment on lines +14 to +17
export async function saveGeneratedCode(
filePath: string,
content: string,
): Promise<string> {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add input validation and security checks

The function needs input validation and security measures to prevent potential vulnerabilities.

+import { normalize, isAbsolute } from 'path';
+
+const MAX_FILE_SIZE = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // 10MB limit
+const ALLOWED_EXTENSIONS = ['.ts', '.js', '.json', '.md'];
+
 export async function saveGeneratedCode(
   filePath: string,
   content: string,
 ): Promise<string> {
+  // Input validation
+  if (!filePath || typeof filePath !== 'string') {
+    throw new Error('Invalid filePath: must be a non-empty string');
+  }
+  if (!content || typeof content !== 'string') {
+    throw new Error('Invalid content: must be a non-empty string');
+  }
+
+  // Security checks
+  const normalizedPath = normalize(filePath);
+  if (isAbsolute(normalizedPath)) {
+    throw new Error('Absolute paths are not allowed');
+  }
+  if (normalizedPath.includes('..')) {
+    throw new Error('Path traversal is not allowed');
+  }
+  if (!ALLOWED_EXTENSIONS.some(ext => normalizedPath.endsWith(ext))) {
+    throw new Error('Invalid file extension');
+  }
+  if (Buffer.byteLength(content, 'utf8') > MAX_FILE_SIZE) {
+    throw new Error('File size exceeds maximum limit');
+  }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
export async function saveGeneratedCode(
filePath: string,
content: string,
): Promise<string> {
import { normalize, isAbsolute } from 'path';
const MAX_FILE_SIZE = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // 10MB limit
const ALLOWED_EXTENSIONS = ['.ts', '.js', '.json', '.md'];
export async function saveGeneratedCode(
filePath: string,
content: string,
): Promise<string> {
// Input validation
if (!filePath || typeof filePath !== 'string') {
throw new Error('Invalid filePath: must be a non-empty string');
}
if (!content || typeof content !== 'string') {
throw new Error('Invalid content: must be a non-empty string');
}
// Security checks
const normalizedPath = normalize(filePath);
if (isAbsolute(normalizedPath)) {
throw new Error('Absolute paths are not allowed');
}
if (normalizedPath.includes('..')) {
throw new Error('Path traversal is not allowed');
}
if (!ALLOWED_EXTENSIONS.some(ext => normalizedPath.endsWith(ext))) {
throw new Error('Invalid file extension');
}
if (Buffer.byteLength(content, 'utf8') > MAX_FILE_SIZE) {
throw new Error('File size exceeds maximum limit');
}

Comment on lines +30 to +34
it('should return a valid root directory', () => {
const rootDir = getRootDir();
expect(rootDir).toBeDefined();
expect(rootDir).toContain('.codefox');
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add edge case tests

The current test suite lacks coverage for important edge cases.

it('should handle special characters in project ID', () => {
  const projectId = 'test@project#123';
  const projectPath = getProjectPath(projectId);
  expect(projectPath).toBeDefined();
  expect(path.basename(projectPath)).toBe(encodeURIComponent(projectId));
});

it('should handle empty or invalid inputs', () => {
  expect(() => getProjectPath('')).toThrow();
  expect(() => getProjectPath(null)).toThrow();
  expect(() => getProjectPath(undefined)).toThrow();
});

Also applies to: 36-40, 42-47

Comment on lines +16 to +20
const cleanUp = () => {
// if (existsSync(ROOT_DIR)) {
// rmdirSync(ROOT_DIR, { recursive: true });
// }
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Uncomment cleanup code for proper test isolation

The cleanup function is commented out, which could lead to test pollution.

   const cleanUp = () => {
-    // if (existsSync(ROOT_DIR)) {
-    //   rmdirSync(ROOT_DIR, { recursive: true });
-    // }
+    if (existsSync(ROOT_DIR)) {
+      rmdirSync(ROOT_DIR, { recursive: true });
+    }
   };
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const cleanUp = () => {
// if (existsSync(ROOT_DIR)) {
// rmdirSync(ROOT_DIR, { recursive: true });
// }
};
const cleanUp = () => {
if (existsSync(ROOT_DIR)) {
rmdirSync(ROOT_DIR, { recursive: true });
}
};

Comment on lines +65 to +86
async function generateAndSaveCode() {
const generatedCode = `
import { Controller, Get } from '@nestjs/common';
@Controller('example')
export class ExampleController {
@Get()
getHello(): string {
return 'Hello World!';
}
}
`;

const fileName = 'example.controller.ts';

try {
const filePath = await saveGeneratedCode(fileName, generatedCode);
console.log(`Generated code saved at: ${filePath}`);
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to save generated code:', error);
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix unsafe path handling in generateAndSaveCode

The function uses a hardcoded filename without proper path resolution.

 async function generateAndSaveCode() {
   const generatedCode = `
     import { Controller, Get } from '@nestjs/common';

     @Controller('example')
     export class ExampleController {
       @Get()
       getHello(): string {
         return 'Hello World!';
       }
     }
   `;

   const fileName = 'example.controller.ts';
+  const filePath = path.join(getRootDir(), 'generated', fileName);

   try {
-    const filePath = await saveGeneratedCode(fileName, generatedCode);
+    const savedPath = await saveGeneratedCode(filePath, generatedCode);
-    console.log(`Generated code saved at: ${filePath}`);
+    console.log(`Generated code saved at: ${savedPath}`);
   } catch (error) {
-    console.error('Failed to save generated code:', error);
+    console.error(`Failed to save generated code to ${filePath}:`, error);
     throw error;  // Re-throw to fail the test
   }
 }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-generate/index.ts (1)

The virtual directory is only used for validation, not for file generation

The code review reveals an issue: while the FileGeneratorHandler uses the virtual directory to validate file paths (isValidFile), it doesn't update the virtual directory structure when new files are generated. This means the virtual directory won't reflect the actual file system changes, which could lead to inconsistencies in subsequent operations.

Key issues:

  • The VirtualDirectory class is only used for validation via isValidFile method
  • After createFile is called, there's no corresponding update to the virtual directory structure
  • The virtual directory will become out of sync with the actual file system

The code should be updated to maintain consistency between the virtual directory and the actual file system by adding appropriate calls to update the virtual directory after file creation.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-180: Verify the impact of file generation on the virtual directory.

The file generation process should be reflected in the virtual directory structure.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for virtual directory updates after file generation
ast-grep --pattern 'virtualDir.$$$update$$$'

Length of output: 46


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any method calls or modifications to virtualDir
ast-grep --pattern 'this.virtualDir.$_($_)'

# Also search for any direct assignments or modifications
ast-grep --pattern 'this.virtualDir = $_'

# Let's also check the VirtualDirectory class implementation
rg -A 5 "class VirtualDirectory" 

Length of output: 764


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the VirtualDirectory class methods
rg -A 10 "class VirtualDirectory" backend/src/build-system/virtual-dir/index.ts

# Check for methods that modify the virtual directory
ast-grep --pattern 'class VirtualDirectory {
  $$$
  add$_($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Also check for update methods
ast-grep --pattern 'class VirtualDirectory {
  $$$
  update$_($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 439


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the entire VirtualDirectory implementation
cat backend/src/build-system/virtual-dir/index.ts

# Also check if there are any other handlers that modify the virtual directory
rg -l "virtualDirectory" backend/src/build-system/handlers/

Length of output: 3168

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-generate/index.ts (2)

41-41: Address TODO comment and enhance file content generation.

  1. The TODO comment needs to be addressed.
  2. The createFile method currently uses placeholder content, which may not be the intended behavior.

Would you like me to help implement proper file content generation logic or create an issue to track this task?

Also applies to: 54-57


Line range hint 41-64: Consider enhancing error handling and logging.

The file generation process could benefit from:

  1. More detailed error messages in case of file system operations failure
  2. Structured logging of the generation process
  3. Rollback mechanism in case of partial failure
 async generateFiles(
   markdownContent: string,
   projectSrcPath: string,
 ): Promise<{ success: boolean; data: string }> {
+  const generatedFiles: string[] = [];
+  try {
     const jsonData = extractJsonFromMarkdown(markdownContent);
     // Build the dependency graph and detect cycles before any file operations
     const { graph, nodes } = this.buildDependencyGraph(jsonData);
     this.detectCycles(graph);

     // Add virtual directory validation
     this.validateAgainstVirtualDirectory(nodes);

     // After validation and cycle detection, perform topological sort
     const sortedFiles = this.getSortedFiles(graph, nodes);

     // Generate files in the correct order
     for (const file of sortedFiles) {
       const fullPath = normalizePath(path.resolve(projectSrcPath, file));
       this.logger.log(`Generating file in dependency order: ${fullPath}`);
       await this.createFile(fullPath);
+      generatedFiles.push(fullPath);
     }

     this.logger.log('All files generated successfully.');
     return {
       success: true,
       data: 'Files and dependencies created successfully.',
     };
+  } catch (error) {
+    this.logger.error(`File generation failed: ${error.message}`);
+    // Attempt to clean up generated files
+    for (const file of generatedFiles) {
+      try {
+        await fs.unlink(file);
+      } catch (cleanupError) {
+        this.logger.error(`Failed to clean up file ${file}: ${cleanupError.message}`);
+      }
+    }
+    throw error;
+  }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb5d38e and b934845.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-generate/index.ts (3 hunks)
  • backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts (1)

12-12: LGTM! Handler registration looks good.

The FileGeneratorHandler is properly imported and registered following the existing pattern.

Also applies to: 34-34

backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-generate/index.ts (1)

8-10: LGTM! Good improvements to type safety and utilities.

The implementation of BuildHandler interface and addition of necessary utilities enhance the code structure.

Also applies to: 12-13

Comment on lines +20 to +22
const uuid = context.getData('projectUUID');

const projectSrcPath = getProjectPath(uuid);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling for invalid UUID.

The UUID retrieval lacks validation and error handling. Consider adding checks to ensure the UUID exists and is valid.

-    const uuid = context.getData('projectUUID');
-    const projectSrcPath = getProjectPath(uuid);
+    const uuid = context.getData('projectUUID');
+    if (!uuid) {
+      throw new Error('Project UUID is required but was not provided in context');
+    }
+    const projectSrcPath = getProjectPath(uuid);
+    if (!projectSrcPath) {
+      throw new Error(`Could not resolve project path for UUID: ${uuid}`);
+    }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const uuid = context.getData('projectUUID');
const projectSrcPath = getProjectPath(uuid);
const uuid = context.getData('projectUUID');
if (!uuid) {
throw new Error('Project UUID is required but was not provided in context');
}
const projectSrcPath = getProjectPath(uuid);
if (!projectSrcPath) {
throw new Error(`Could not resolve project path for UUID: ${uuid}`);
}

Copy link
Collaborator

@NarwhalChen NarwhalChen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think bot provides useful review

@Sma1lboy Sma1lboy merged commit 418a3a8 into main Dec 16, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@Sma1lboy Sma1lboy deleted the feat(backend)file-generate-function-specific-place branch December 16, 2024 19:14
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants