Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hl/ask line #661

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 18, 2024
Merged

Hl/ask line #661

merged 9 commits into from
Feb 18, 2024

Conversation

hussam789
Copy link
Collaborator

@hussam789 hussam789 commented Feb 15, 2024

Type

enhancement, documentation


Description

  • Integrate PR_LineQuestions for handling line-specific queries in PRs.
  • Implement extract_hunk_lines_from_patch to extract lines from patches for focused questions.
  • Update configuration loader to include new prompts for line questions.
  • Implement GitHub provider methods for replying to comments by ID and adding reactions.
  • Add server logic to handle line comments in GitHub App.
  • Document the /ask command usage for specific lines in PRs.
  • Add TOML configuration for prompts related to line-specific questions.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
6 files
pr_agent.py
Integrate Line-Specific Question Handling in PR Agent       

pr_agent/agent/pr_agent.py

  • Import PR_LineQuestions for handling line-specific questions.
  • Add ask_line to the command mapping, allowing for line-specific
    queries.
  • +2/-0     
    git_patch_processing.py
    Add Function to Extract Specific Lines from Patches           

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

  • Implement extract_hunk_lines_from_patch to extract specific lines from
    a patch.
  • +54/-0   
    git_provider.py
    Define Method for Replying to Comments by ID in Git Provider Interface

    pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py

    • Define reply_to_comment_from_comment_id method stub.
    +3/-0     
    github_provider.py
    Implement Comment Reply and Reaction Features for GitHub Provider

    pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py

  • Implement reply_to_comment_from_comment_id for GitHub.
  • Add logic to add "eyes" reaction to comments.
  • +17/-0   
    github_app.py
    Add Handling for Line Comments in GitHub App                         

    pr_agent/servers/github_app.py

    • Handle line comments in GitHub App server logic.
    +20/-0   
    pr_line_questions.py
    Implement Line-Specific Question Handling                               

    pr_agent/tools/pr_line_questions.py

  • Implement PR_LineQuestions class for answering line-specific
    questions.
  • +105/-0 
    Configuration changes
    2 files
    config_loader.py
    Update Configuration Loader to Include Line Questions Prompts

    pr_agent/config_loader.py

  • Include pr_line_questions_prompts.toml in the configuration loader.
  • +1/-0     
    pr_line_questions_prompts.toml
    Add Prompts Configuration for Line-Specific Questions       

    pr_agent/settings/pr_line_questions_prompts.toml

    • Add prompts configuration for line-specific questions.
    +53/-0   
    Documentation
    1 files
    ASK.md
    Document Line-Specific Questions Feature                                 

    docs/ASK.md

    • Document how to use the /ask command on specific lines of code.
    +9/-0     

    ✨ Usage guide:

    Overview:
    The describe tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a description for the PR - title, type, summary, walkthrough and labels. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the describe tool (pr_description section), use the following template:

    /describe --pr_description.some_config1=... --pr_description.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_description]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation
    • When you first install the app, the default mode for the describe tool is:
    pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true" 
                             "--pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true", ...]
    

    meaning the describe tool will run automatically on every PR, will keep the original title, and will add the original user description above the generated description.

    • Markers are an alternative way to control the generated description, to give maximal control to the user. If you set:
    pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.use_description_markers=true", ...]
    

    the tool will replace every marker of the form pr_agent:marker_name in the PR description with the relevant content, where marker_name is one of the following:

    • type: the PR type.
    • summary: the PR summary.
    • walkthrough: the PR walkthrough.

    Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.

    Custom labels

    The default labels of the describe tool are quite generic: [Bug fix, Tests, Enhancement, Documentation, Other].

    If you specify custom labels in the repo's labels page or via configuration file, you can get tailored labels for your use cases.
    Examples for custom labels:

    • Main topic:performance - pr_agent:The main topic of this PR is performance
    • New endpoint - pr_agent:A new endpoint was added in this PR
    • SQL query - pr_agent:A new SQL query was added in this PR
    • Dockerfile changes - pr_agent:The PR contains changes in the Dockerfile
    • ...

    The list above is eclectic, and aims to give an idea of different possibilities. Define custom labels that are relevant for your repo and use cases.
    Note that Labels are not mutually exclusive, so you can add multiple label categories.
    Make sure to provide proper title, and a detailed and well-phrased description for each label, so the tool will know when to suggest it.

    Inline File Walkthrough 💎

    For enhanced user experience, the describe tool can add file summaries directly to the "Files changed" tab in the PR page.
    This will enable you to quickly understand the changes in each file, while reviewing the code changes (diffs).

    To enable inline file summary, set pr_description.inline_file_summary in the configuration file, possible values are:

    • 'table': File changes walkthrough table will be displayed on the top of the "Files changed" tab, in addition to the "Conversation" tab.
    • true: A collapsable file comment with changes title and a changes summary for each file in the PR.
    • false (default): File changes walkthrough will be added only to the "Conversation" tab.
    Utilizing extra instructions

    The describe tool can be configured with extra instructions, to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Notice that the general structure of the description is fixed, and cannot be changed. Extra instructions can change the content or style of each sub-section of the PR description.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_description] 
    extra_instructions="""
    - The PR title should be in the format: '<PR type>: <title>'
    - The title should be short and concise (up to 10 words)
    - ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the describe usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    @codiumai-pr-agent-pro codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Feb 15, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Feb 15, 2024

    PR Description updated to latest commit (8ed98c8)

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Review

         PR feedback                    
    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    4, because the PR introduces a significant feature involving multiple components such as new functions for extracting lines from patches, updating the configuration loader, implementing GitHub provider methods, and adding server logic for handling line comments. The complexity and interconnectivity of these changes require a thorough review to ensure compatibility and functionality.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues
    • The extract_hunk_lines_from_patch function in git_patch_processing.py does not handle cases where the patch might not follow the expected format strictly, which could lead to incorrect extraction of lines.
    • In github_provider.py, the reply_to_comment_from_comment_id method catches a general exception and logs it, but it might be beneficial to handle specific exceptions or retry logic for transient network issues.
    • The implementation of new commands and their handling in pr_agent.py and github_app.py might introduce edge cases not covered by the current logic, especially in error handling and command parsing.
    🔒 Security concerns

    No


    ✨ Usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Utilizing extra instructions

    The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_reviewer] # /review #
    extra_instructions="""
    In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    How to enable\disable automation
    • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
    pr_commands = ["/review", ...]
    

    meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
    Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

    Auto-labels

    The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

    • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
    • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
    Extra sub-tools

    The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
    It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
    Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
    require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

    Auto-approve PRs

    By invoking:

    /review auto_approve
    

    The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

    To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

    [pr_reviewer]
    enable_auto_approval = true
    

    (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

    You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

    [pr_reviewer]
    maximal_review_effort = 5
    
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Feb 15, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions

    Suggestions                                                                                                                                                     
    best practice
    Rename the class to follow PEP 8 naming conventions.                         

    Consider following the PEP 8 style guide for class names to improve readability and
    maintain consistency with Python's naming conventions. Change PR_LineQuestions to
    PRLineQuestions.

    pr_agent/agent/pr_agent.py [17]

    -from pr_agent.tools.pr_line_questions import PR_LineQuestions
    +from pr_agent.tools.pr_line_questions import PRLineQuestions
     
    Use specific exceptions for better error handling.                           

    Use a more specific exception instead of a broad except clause to handle known exceptions
    more gracefully and improve code reliability.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [277]

    -except:  # '@@ -0,0 +1 @@' case
    +except ValueError:  # '@@ -0,0 +1 @@' case
     
    Handle exceptions properly instead of passing silently.                      

    Instead of silently passing in the except block, consider logging the exception or
    handling it in a way that does not ignore the error. This will help in debugging and
    maintaining the code.

    pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py [466-467]

    -except:
    -            pass
    +except Exception as e:
    +            get_logger().exception(f"Failed to add eyes reaction, error: {e}")
     
    maintainability
    Refactor the function to reduce complexity.                                  

    To improve code readability and maintainability, consider refactoring the
    handle_line_comments function to reduce its complexity by breaking it down into smaller
    functions.

    pr_agent/servers/github_app.py [196-210]

    +# Example refactoring, detailed implementation depends on the context
    +async def extract_line_comment_details(body):
    +    # Extract and return details from the body
    +    pass
    +
     async def handle_line_comments(action, body, comment_body, event):
    +    # Use the new helper function
    +    details = await extract_line_comment_details(body)
     
    possible issue
    Handle the case where ask_diff might not contain expected data. 

    To ensure the robustness of the code, explicitly handle the case where ask_diff might not
    contain the expected data, and provide a fallback or error message.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_line_questions.py [63-69]

     if ask_diff:
             self.patch_with_lines, self.selected_lines = extract_hunk_lines_from_patch(ask_diff,
    +else:
    +        # Handle the case where ask_diff is not set or does not contain expected data
    +        get_logger().error("ask_diff is not available or does not contain expected data.")
    +        return
     

    ✨ Usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation

    When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

    pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]
    

    meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

    Utilizing extra instructions

    Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
    extra_instructions="""
    Emphasize the following aspects:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    A note on code suggestions quality
    • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
    • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
    • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
    • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator

    mrT23 commented Feb 15, 2024

    /ask does this PR contains proper documentation ?

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Feb 15, 2024

    Question: does this PR contain proper documentation ?

    Answer:
    Yes, this Pull Request (PR) contains proper documentation. The PR includes updates to the docs/ASK.md file to explain the new functionality of asking questions about specific lines of code in the PR. This documentation provides clear instructions on how to use the /ask command on specific lines of code, which enhances the understandability and usability of the new feature.

    Moreover, the PR also includes comments in the code, especially in the pr_agent/tools/pr_line_questions.py and pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py files, which explain the purpose and functionality of the new methods and classes. This is a good practice as it makes the code easier to understand and maintain.

    However, it's always a good idea to ensure that the documentation is comprehensive and covers all the new features or changes introduced in the PR. It might be helpful to include examples or use-cases in the documentation to provide more context about the new features.


    ✨ Usage guide:

    Overview:
    The ask tool answers questions about the PR, based on the PR code changes.
    It can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR:

    /ask "..."
    

    Note that the tool does not have "memory" of previous questions, and answers each question independently.

    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the ask usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator

    mrT23 commented Feb 15, 2024

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.extra_instructions="focus on edge cases"

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Feb 15, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions

    Suggestions                                                                                                                                                     
    enhancement
    Handle unexpected values for the 'side' parameter.                           

    Consider handling the case where the side parameter is neither 'left' nor 'right'. This
    can be done by either raising an exception or logging a warning to indicate that the side
    parameter has an unexpected value.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [282-290]

     if side.lower() == 'left':
         if not (start1 <= line_start <= start1 + size1):
             skip_hunk = True
             continue
     elif side.lower() == 'right':
         if not (start2 <= line_start <= start2 + size2):
             skip_hunk = True
             continue
    +else:
    +    # Handle unexpected 'side' value
    +    raise ValueError(f"Unexpected side value: {side}")
     
    Add retry logic and specific exception handling to reply_to_comment_from_comment_id.

    Implement error handling for the reply_to_comment_from_comment_id method to catch specific
    exceptions related to network issues or API limits, and retry the request a certain number
    of times before logging the failure.

    pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py [387-395]

     def reply_to_comment_from_comment_id(self, comment_id: int, body: str):
    -    try:
    -        headers, data_patch = self.pr._requester.requestJsonAndCheck(
    -            "POST", f"https://api.github.com/repos/{self.repo}/pulls/{self.pr_num}/comments/{comment_id}/replies",
    -            input={"body": body}
    -        )
    -    except Exception as e:
    -        get_logger().exception(f"Failed to reply comment, error: {e}")
    +    for _ in range(3):  # Retry up to 3 times
    +        try:
    +            headers, data_patch = self.pr._requester.requestJsonAndCheck(
    +                "POST", f"https://api.github.com/repos/{self.repo}/pulls/{self.pr_num}/comments/{comment_id}/replies",
    +                input={"body": body}
    +            )
    +            break  # Success, exit loop
    +        except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
    +            get_logger().warning(f"Retry due to network error: {e}")
    +            time.sleep(1)  # Wait 1 second before retrying
    +        except Exception as e:
    +            get_logger().exception(f"Failed to reply comment, error: {e}")
    +            break  # Non-retryable error, exit loop
     
    best practice
    Validate the presence of keys in the body["comment"] dictionary.

    Validate the presence of expected keys in the body["comment"] dictionary before accessing
    them to avoid KeyError. Use .get() method or check if the key exists.

    pr_agent/servers/github_app.py [198-206]

    -start_line = body["comment"]["start_line"]
    -end_line = body["comment"]["line"]
    +start_line = body["comment"].get("start_line")
    +end_line = body["comment"].get("line")
     start_line = end_line if not start_line else start_line
     question = comment_body.replace('/ask', '').strip()
    -diff_hunk = body["comment"]["diff_hunk"]
    -path = body["comment"]["path"]
    -side = body["comment"]["side"]
    -comment_id = body["comment"]["id"]
    +diff_hunk = body["comment"].get("diff_hunk")
    +path = body["comment"].get("path")
    +side = body["comment"].get("side")
    +comment_id = body["comment"].get("id")
     
    Specify exceptions in try-except blocks for better error handling.

    Instead of using a broad except clause in the run method, specify the exceptions you
    expect to catch. This will help in identifying and handling specific errors more
    effectively.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_line_questions.py [79-85]

     if self.patch_with_lines:
    -    response = await retry_with_fallback_models(self._get_prediction, model_type=ModelType.TURBO)
    +    try:
    +        response = await retry_with_fallback_models(self._get_prediction, model_type=ModelType.TURBO)
    +    except SpecificException as e:
    +        get_logger().error(f"Error during prediction: {e}")
    +        return "Could not process your request due to an error."
     
         get_logger().info('Preparing answer...')
         if comment_id:
    -        self.git_provider.reply_to_comment_from_comment_id(comment_id, response)
    +        try:
    +            self.git_provider.reply_to_comment_from_comment_id(comment_id, response)
    +        except SpecificException as e:
    +            get_logger().error(f"Failed to reply to comment: {e}")
         else:
    -        self.git_provider.publish_comment(response)
    +        try:
    +            self.git_provider.publish_comment(response)
    +        except SpecificException as e:
    +            get_logger().error(f"Failed to publish comment: {e}")
     
    readability
    Use descriptive variable names for clarity.                                  

    Use a more descriptive variable name than res to improve code readability. For example,
    hunk_header_values would make it clearer that these are the parsed values from the hunk
    header.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [271-279]

    -res = list(match.groups())
    -for i in range(len(res)):
    -    if res[i] is None:
    -        res[i] = 0
    +hunk_header_values = list(match.groups())
    +for i in range(len(hunk_header_values)):
    +    if hunk_header_values[i] is None:
    +        hunk_header_values[i] = 0
     try:
    -    start1, size1, start2, size2 = map(int, res[:4])
    +    start1, size1, start2, size2 = map(int, hunk_header_values[:4])
     except:  # '@@ -0,0 +1 @@' case
    -    start1, size1, start2 = map(int, res[:3])
    +    start1, size1, start2 = map(int, hunk_header_values[:3])
         start2 = 0
     

    ✨ Usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation

    When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

    pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]
    

    meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

    Utilizing extra instructions

    Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
    extra_instructions="""
    Emphasize the following aspects:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    A note on code suggestions quality
    • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
    • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
    • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
    • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator

    mrT23 commented Feb 15, 2024

    /analyze

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Feb 15, 2024

    PR Analysis

    • This screen contains a list of code components that were changed in this PR.
    • You can initiate specific actions for each component, by checking the relevant boxes.
    • After you check a box, the action will be performed automatically by PR-Agent.
    • Results will appear as a comment on the PR, typically after 30-60 seconds.
    fileChanged components
    git_patch_processing.py
    • Test
    • Docs
    • Improve
     
    extract_hunk_lines_from_patch
    (function)
     
    +52/-0
     
    git_provider.py
    • Test
    • Docs
    • Improve
     
    reply_to_comment_from_comment_id
    (method of GitProvider)
     
    +2/-0
     
    github_provider.py
    • Test
    • Docs
    • Improve
     
    reply_to_comment_from_comment_id
    (method of GithubProvider)
     
    +9/-0
     
    • Test
    • Docs
    • Improve
     
    add_eyes_reaction
    (method of GithubProvider)
     
    +8/-1
     
    github_app.py
    • Test
    • Docs
    • Improve
     
    handle_request
    (function)
     
    +4/-1
     
    • Test
    • Docs
    • Improve
     
    handle_line_comments
    (function)
     
    +15/-0
     
    pr_line_questions.py
    • Test
    • Docs
    • Improve
     
    PR_LineQuestions
    (class)
     
    +84/-0
     

    ✨ Usage guide:

    Using static code analysis capabilities, the analyze tool scans the PR code changes and find the code components (methods, functions, classes) that changed in the PR.
    The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR:

    /analyze
    

    Language that are currently supported: Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, TypeScript.
    See more information about the tool in the docs.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Feb 15, 2024

    Generated tests for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

      extract_hunk_lines_from_patch (function) [+52/-0]

      Component signature:

      def extract_hunk_lines_from_patch(patch: str, file_name, line_start, line_end, side) -> tuple[str, str]:


      Tests for code changes in extract_hunk_lines_from_patch function:

      [happy path]
      extract_hunk_lines_from_patch should correctly extract lines from a patch for the 'right' side when the line range is within a single hunk

      test_code:

      import pytest
      
      def test_extract_lines_right_side_single_hunk():
          patch = """@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
          -old line
          +new line"""
          file_name = "example.py"
          line_start = 1
          line_end = 1
          side = "right"
          expected_patch_with_lines = "\n\n## file: 'example.py'\n\n@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@\n        -old line\n        +new line"
          expected_selected_lines = "        +new line"
          result = extract_hunk_lines_from_patch(patch, file_name, line_start, line_end, side)
          assert result == (expected_patch_with_lines, expected_selected_lines), "The extracted lines do not match the expected output for the right side."
      [edge case]
      extract_hunk_lines_from_patch should handle patches with 'no newline at end of file' without including this line in the output

      test_code:

      import pytest
      
      def test_handle_no_newline_at_end_of_file():
          patch = """@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
          -old line
          +new line
          \ No newline at end of file"""
          file_name = "example.py"
          line_start = 1
          line_end = 1
          side = "right"
          expected_patch_with_lines = "\n\n## file: 'example.py'\n\n@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@\n        -old line\n        +new line"
          expected_selected_lines = "        +new line"
          result = extract_hunk_lines_from_patch(patch, file_name, line_start, line_end, side)
          assert result == (expected_patch_with_lines, expected_selected_lines), "The function did not correctly handle patches with 'no newline at end of file'."
      [edge case]
      extract_hunk_lines_from_patch should return an empty string for both outputs when the specified line range does not exist within any hunk for the specified side

      test_code:

      import pytest
      
      def test_line_range_outside_hunks():
          patch = """@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
          -old line
          +new line"""
          file_name = "example.py"
          line_start = 3
          line_end = 4
          side = "right"
          expected_patch_with_lines = "\n\n## file: 'example.py'\n\n@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@\n        -old line\n        +new line"
          expected_selected_lines = ""
          result = extract_hunk_lines_from_patch(patch, file_name, line_start, line_end, side)
          assert result == (expected_patch_with_lines, expected_selected_lines), "The function should return empty strings when the line range is outside the hunks."

      ✨ Usage guide:

      The test tool generate tests for a selected component, based on the PR code changes.
      It can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR:

      /test component_name
      

      where 'component_name' is the name of a specific component in the PR. To get a list of the components that changed in the PR, use the analyze tool.
      Language that are currently supported: Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, TypeScript.

      Configuration options:

      • num_tests: number of tests to generate. Default is 3.
      • testing_framework: the testing framework to use. If not set, for Python it will use pytest, for Java it will use JUnit, for C++ it will use Catch2, and for JavaScript and TypeScript it will use jest.
      • avoid_mocks: if set to true, the tool will try to avoid using mocks in the generated tests. Note that even if this option is set to true, the tool might still use mocks if it cannot generate a test without them. Default is true.
      • extra_instructions: Optional extra instructions to the tool. For example: "use the following mock injection scheme: ...".
      • file: in case there are several components with the same name, you can specify the relevant file.
      • class_name: in case there are several components with the same name in the same file, you can specify the relevant class name.

      See more information about the test tool in the docs.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Feb 15, 2024

    Generated docstring for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

      extract_hunk_lines_from_patch (function) [+52/-0]

      Component signature:

      def extract_hunk_lines_from_patch(patch: str, file_name, line_start, line_end, side) -> tuple[str, str]:

      Docstring:

      """
      Extracts the lines from a patch that correspond to a specific hunk.
      
      Args:
          patch (str): The patch string.
          file_name: The name of the file in the patch.
          line_start: The starting line number of the hunk.
          line_end: The ending line number of the hunk.
          side: The side of the hunk to extract ('left' or 'right').
      
      Returns:
          tuple[str, str]: A tuple containing the patch string with line numbers and the selected lines from the hunk.
      
      Raises:
          None
      """

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Feb 15, 2024

    Generated code suggestions for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

      extract_hunk_lines_from_patch (function) [+52/-0]

      Component signature:

      def extract_hunk_lines_from_patch(patch: str, file_name, line_start, line_end, side) -> tuple[str, str]:


      Suggestions and improvements for code changes in extract_hunk_lines_from_patch function:

      Suggestions                                                                                                                                                     
      best practice
      Use specific exception handling instead of a bare except.                    

      Replace the bare except: with a more specific exception handling to avoid catching
      unexpected exceptions. Use ValueError to catch invalid integer conversion.

      pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

      -except:  # '@@ -0,0 +1 @@' case
      +except ValueError:  # '@@ -0,0 +1 @@' case
       
      performance
      Refactor repeated lowercasing of the side variable.             

      Refactor the repeated side.lower() checks into a single check at the beginning of the
      function to improve performance and readability.

      pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

      -if side.lower() == 'left':
      +side = side.lower()
      +if side == 'left':
       
      Use join() for string concatenation for better performance.     

      Instead of manually concatenating strings with newlines, use '\n'.join() for building
      patch_with_lines_str and selected_lines for better performance and readability.

      pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

      -patch_with_lines_str += f'\n{header_line}\n'
      -selected_lines += line + '\n'
      +patch_with_lines_str_lines = [f'\n{header_line}']
      +selected_lines_list = [line]
      +# At the end of the function, before return:
      +patch_with_lines_str = '\n'.join(patch_with_lines_str_lines).rstrip()
      +selected_lines = '\n'.join(selected_lines_list).rstrip()
       
      enhancement
      Use list comprehension for more Pythonic code.                               

      Use a more Pythonic way to replace None values in res with 0 using list comprehension.

      pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

      -for i in range(len(res)):
      -    if res[i] is None:
      -        res[i] = 0
      +res = [0 if r is None else r for r in res]
       

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator

    mrT23 commented Feb 15, 2024

    /config

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Possible Configurations:

    pr_description.publish_labels = True
    pr_description.publish_description_as_comment = False
    pr_description.add_original_user_description = True
    pr_description.keep_original_user_title = True
    pr_description.use_bullet_points = True
    pr_description.extra_instructions = ''
    pr_description.enable_pr_type = True
    pr_description.final_update_message = True
    pr_description.enable_help_text = True
    pr_description.enable_semantic_files_types = True
    pr_description.collapsible_file_list = 'adaptive'
    pr_description.inline_file_summary = False
    pr_description.use_description_markers = False
    pr_description.include_generated_by_header = True

    pr_questions.enable_help_text = True

    pr_custom_suggestions.prompt = 'The suggestions should focus only on the following:\n- ...\n- ...\n...\n'
    pr_custom_suggestions.num_code_suggestions = 4
    pr_custom_suggestions.enable_help_text = True

    pr_add_docs.extra_instructions = ''
    pr_add_docs.docs_style = 'Sphinx'
    pr_add_docs.file = ''
    pr_add_docs.class_name = ''

    pr_update_changelog.push_changelog_changes = False
    pr_update_changelog.extra_instructions = ''

    pr_analyze.enable_help_text = True

    pr_test.extra_instructions = ''
    pr_test.testing_framework = ''
    pr_test.num_tests = 3
    pr_test.avoid_mocks = True
    pr_test.file = ''
    pr_test.class_name = ''
    pr_test.enable_help_text = True

    pr_improve_component.num_code_suggestions = 4
    pr_improve_component.extra_instructions = ''
    pr_improve_component.file = ''
    pr_improve_component.class_name = ''

    pr_similar_issue.skip_comments = False
    pr_similar_issue.force_update_dataset = False
    pr_similar_issue.max_issues_to_scan = 500
    pr_similar_issue.vectordb = 'pinecone'

    pr_reviewer.require_focused_review = False
    pr_reviewer.require_score_review = False
    pr_reviewer.require_tests_review = True
    pr_reviewer.require_estimate_effort_to_review = True
    pr_reviewer.require_soc2_ticket = False
    pr_reviewer.soc2_ticket_prompt = 'Does the PR description include a link to ticket in a project management system (e.g., Jira, Asana, Trello, etc.) ?'
    pr_reviewer.num_code_suggestions = 4
    pr_reviewer.inline_code_comments = False
    pr_reviewer.ask_and_reflect = False
    pr_reviewer.remove_previous_review_comment = False
    pr_reviewer.persistent_comment = True
    pr_reviewer.extra_instructions = ''
    pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_security = True
    pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_effort = True
    pr_reviewer.require_all_thresholds_for_incremental_review = False
    pr_reviewer.minimal_commits_for_incremental_review = 0
    pr_reviewer.minimal_minutes_for_incremental_review = 0
    pr_reviewer.enable_help_text = True
    pr_reviewer.enable_auto_approval = True
    pr_reviewer.maximal_review_effort = 5

    pr_code_suggestions.max_context_tokens = 8000
    pr_code_suggestions.num_code_suggestions = 4
    pr_code_suggestions.summarize = True
    pr_code_suggestions.extra_instructions = ''
    pr_code_suggestions.rank_suggestions = False
    pr_code_suggestions.enable_help_text = True
    pr_code_suggestions.auto_extended_mode = True
    pr_code_suggestions.num_code_suggestions_per_chunk = 5
    pr_code_suggestions.max_number_of_calls = 3
    pr_code_suggestions.parallel_calls = True
    pr_code_suggestions.rank_extended_suggestions = False
    pr_code_suggestions.final_clip_factor = 0.8

    docs/ASK.md Show resolved Hide resolved
    docs/ASK.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
    @@ -245,3 +245,59 @@ def convert_to_hunks_with_lines_numbers(patch: str, file) -> str:
    patch_with_lines_str += f"{line_old}\n"

    return patch_with_lines_str.rstrip()


    def extract_hunk_lines_from_patch(patch: str, file_name, line_start, line_end, side) -> tuple[str, str]:
    Copy link
    Collaborator

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    תהיה בנאדם, תוסיף דוקסטרינג קצר. אח״כ רוצים להשתמש בזה שוב, וצריכים לנחש מה הפונקציה עושה

    @@ -64,7 +64,25 @@ async def gitlab_webhook(background_tasks: BackgroundTasks, request: Request):
    mr = data['merge_request']
    url = mr.get('url')
    body = data.get('object_attributes', {}).get('note')
    if data.get('object_attributes', {}).get('type') == 'DiffNote' and '/ask' in body:
    Copy link
    Collaborator

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    move this to a dedicated function

    @Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot Feb 17, 2024
    @Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from CodiumAI-Agent Feb 17, 2024
    @Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot Feb 17, 2024
    @Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from CodiumAI-Agent Feb 17, 2024
    @Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from CodiumAI-Agent Feb 17, 2024
    @Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from CodiumAI-Agent Feb 17, 2024

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Changes walkthrough

                             Relevant files
    Enhancement
    pr_agent.py (+2/-0)
    Integrate Line-Specific Question
    Handling in PR Agent
    git_patch_processing.py (+54/-0)
    Add Function to Extract Specific Lines
    from Patches
    git_provider.py (+3/-0)
    Define Method for Replying to Comments
    by ID in Git Provider Interface
    github_provider.py (+17/-0)
    Implement Comment Reply and Reaction
    Features for GitHub Provider
    github_app.py (+20/-0)
    Add Handling for Line Comments in GitHub
    App
    pr_line_questions.py (+105/-0)
    Implement Line-Specific Question
    Handling
    Configuration changes
    config_loader.py (+1/-0)
    Update Configuration Loader to Include
    Line Questions Prompts
    pr_line_questions_prompts.toml (+53/-0)
    Add Prompts Configuration for
    Line-Specific Questions
    Documentation
    ASK.md (+9/-0)
    Document Line-Specific Questions Feature

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit 7b15101 into main Feb 18, 2024
    1 check passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the hl/ask_line branch February 18, 2024 06:08
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    @hussam789 hussam789 Feb 18, 2024

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Relevant files
    Enhancement

    pr_agent.py (+2/-0)
    Integrate Line-Specific Question Handling in PR Agent

    pr_agent/agent/pr_agent.py

  • Import PR_LineQuestions for handling line-specific questions.
  • Add ask_line to the command mapping, allowing for line-specific
    queries.
  • git_patch_processing.py (+54/-0)
    Add Function to Extract Specific Lines from Patches

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

  • Implement extract_hunk_lines_from_patch to extract specific lines from
    a patch.
  • git_provider.py (+3/-0)
    Define Method for Replying to Comments by ID in Git
    Provider Interface

    pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py

    • Define reply_to_comment_from_comment_id method stub.
    github_provider.py (+17/-0)
    Implement Comment Reply and Reaction Features for GitHub
    Provider

    pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py

  • Implement reply_to_comment_from_comment_id for GitHub.
  • Add logic to add "eyes" reaction to comments.
  • github_app.py (+20/-0)
    Add Handling for Line Comments in GitHub App

    pr_agent/servers/github_app.py

    • Handle line comments in GitHub App server logic.
    pr_line_questions.py (+105/-0)
    Implement Line-Specific Question Handling

    pr_agent/tools/pr_line_questions.py

  • Implement PR_LineQuestions class for answering line-specific
    questions.
  • Configuration changes

    config_loader.py (+1/-0)
    Update Configuration Loader to Include Line Questions
    Prompts

    pr_agent/config_loader.py

  • Include pr_line_questions_prompts.toml in the configuration loader.
  • pr_line_questions_prompts.toml (+53/-0)
    Add Prompts Configuration for Line-Specific Questions

    pr_agent/settings/pr_line_questions_prompts.toml

    • Add prompts configuration for line-specific questions.
    Documentation

    ASK.md (+9/-0)
    Document Line-Specific Questions Feature

    docs/ASK.md

    • Document how to use the /ask command on specific lines of code.

    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    @hussam789 hussam789 Feb 18, 2024

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Enhancement
    pr_agent.py (+2/-0)
    Integrate Line-Specific Question Handling in PR Agent       

    pr_agent/agent/pr_agent.py

  • Import PR_LineQuestions for handling line-specific questions.
  • Add ask_line to the command mapping, allowing for line-specific
    queries.
  • git_patch_processing.py (+54/-0)
    Add Function to Extract Specific Lines from Patches           

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

  • Implement extract_hunk_lines_from_patch to extract specific lines from
    a patch.
  • git_provider.py (+3/-0)
    Define Method for Replying to Comments by ID in Git Provider Interface

    pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py

    • Define reply_to_comment_from_comment_id method stub.
    github_provider.py (+17/-0)
    Implement Comment Reply and Reaction Features for GitHub Provider

    pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py

  • Implement reply_to_comment_from_comment_id for GitHub.
  • Add logic to add "eyes" reaction to comments.
  • github_app.py (+20/-0)
    Add Handling for Line Comments in GitHub App                         

    pr_agent/servers/github_app.py

    • Handle line comments in GitHub App server logic.
    pr_line_questions.py (+105/-0)
    Implement Line-Specific Question Handling                               

    pr_agent/tools/pr_line_questions.py

  • Implement PR_LineQuestions class for answering line-specific
    questions.
  • Configuration changes
    config_loader.py (+1/-0)
    Update Configuration Loader to Include Line Questions Prompts

    pr_agent/config_loader.py

  • Include pr_line_questions_prompts.toml in the configuration loader.
  • pr_line_questions_prompts.toml (+53/-0)
    Add Prompts Configuration for Line-Specific Questions       

    pr_agent/settings/pr_line_questions_prompts.toml

    • Add prompts configuration for line-specific questions.
    Documentation
    ASK.md (+9/-0)
    Document Line-Specific Questions Feature                                 

    docs/ASK.md

    • Document how to use the /ask command on specific lines of code.

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    hussam789 commented Mar 4, 2024

    🔍 Finding similar code for 'reply_to_comment_from_comment_id'

    🔍 No similar code found
    🔍 Relevant Repositories
    Repository: python-gitlab
    Description:
    This repository provides a comprehensive Python wrapper for the GitLab API, including
    methods to interact with discussions and notes (comments) on merge requests, which is
    similar to the reply_to_comment_from_comment_id functionality.
    Repository: gitbeaker
    Description:
    Although primarily a Node.js library, Gitbeaker offers inspiration for interacting
    with GitLab's API, including commenting on merge requests and discussions. It can
    provide insights into structuring similar features in Python.
    Repository: PyGithub
    Description:
    PyGithub is a Python library to access the GitHub API. It includes methods for
    replying to comments on issues and pull requests, which can be adapted for GitLab's
    merge request discussions and comments.
    Repository: ogr
    Description:
    OGR provides a unified interface across multiple git forges (GitHub, GitLab, Pagure).
    It includes abstractions for replying to comments or creating notes on pull requests
    and issues, offering a similar functionality to reply_to_comment_from_comment_id.

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    hussam789 commented Mar 4, 2024

    🔍 Finding similar code for 'reply_to_comment_from_comment_id'

    🔍 No similar code found
    🔍 Relevant Repositories
    Repository: PyGithub/PyGithub
    Description:
    PyGithub is a Python library to access the GitHub API v3. It includes methods for
    replying to comments on pull requests and issues, which is similar to the
    reply_to_comment_from_comment_id functionality.
    Repository: sigmavirus24/github3.py
    Description:
    github3.py is another Python library for interfacing with the GitHub API. It provides
    comprehensive access to GitHub resources, including the ability to reply to comments
    in issues and pull requests, paralleling the reply_to_comment_from_comment_id method.

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    hussam789 commented Mar 4, 2024

    🔍 Finding similar code for 'reply_to_comment_from_comment_id'

    🔍 Similar Code Repository: vrroshni/AEC_Industry_WebApplication
    File: aec_backend/aec_app/models.py
    Repository: alliefitter/boto3_type_annotations
    File: boto3_type_annotations/boto3_type_annotations/codecommit/client.py
    Repository: eganwall/SolutionGambling
    File: v2/SG_Utils.py
    Repository: themotte/tildes
    File: tildes/tildes/views/api/web/comment.py
    Repository: zhanglintc/wb
    File: src/wb.py
    🔍 Relevant Repositories
    Repository: PyGithub/PyGithub
    Description:
    PyGithub is a Python library to access the GitHub API v3. It includes methods for
    interacting with pull request comments, which can be used to implement functionality
    similar to reply_to_comment_from_comment_id by leveraging the create_issue_comment
    method or directly interacting with the GitHub API endpoints for comments.
    Repository: sigmavirus24/github3.py
    Description:
    github3.py is another Python library for interacting with the GitHub API. It provides
    a more pythonic way to work with GitHub data, including pull requests and comments.
    The library's issue and pull request objects have methods for commenting that could
    be adapted to reply to comments on pull requests, similar to the provided method.

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    Finding similar code for 'reply_to_comment_from_comment_id'

    Work in progress ...

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    Finding similar code for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

    Work in progress ...

    4 similar comments
    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    Finding similar code for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

    Work in progress ...

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    Finding similar code for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

    Work in progress ...

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    Finding similar code for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

    Work in progress ...

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    Finding similar code for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

    Work in progress ...

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    hussam789 commented Mar 4, 2024

    🔍 Finding similar code for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

    🏷 Extracted Keywordspatch, diff, git, regex, parsing
    🌍 Search context/n/n- [x] Global/n- [ ] Organization
    🔍 Similar Code Repository: peritus/bumpversion
    Filename: __init__.py
    Repository: git/git
    Filename: git-p4.py
    Repository: pypa/pipenv
    Filename: git.py
    Repository: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr
    Filename: check_compliance.py
    Repository: WebKit/WebKit
    Filename: diff_parser.py
    📂 Relevant Repositories
    Repository: diff2Html
    Description:
    A library that parses git diffs and generates pretty HTML for display. It includes
    functionality for parsing unified diffs, which is similar to extracting lines from a
    patch as extract_hunk_lines_from_patch does.
    Repository: GitPython
    Description:
    GitPython is a python library used to interact with Git repositories. While it
    doesn't directly offer a function like extract_hunk_lines_from_patch, it deals with
    git objects and patches, providing a foundation for implementing such functionality.
    Repository: unidiff
    Description:
    A Python library that provides a unified diff parser and printer. It's closely
    related to the functionality of extract_hunk_lines_from_patch as it deals with
    parsing and handling diff patches.
    Repository: pydriller
    Description:
    Pydriller is a Python framework that helps in mining software repositories. It
    includes features for parsing diffs and commits, which is relevant to extracting
    specific lines from patches.

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    hussam789 commented Mar 4, 2024

    🔍 Finding similar code for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

    🏷 Extracted Keywordspatch, diff, git, regex, text-processing                                                                               
    🌍 Search Context
    • Global/n- [ ] Organization
    🔍 Similar Code Repository: microsoft/azurelinux
    Filename: perl.spec
    Repository: sgidevnet/sgug-rse
    Filename: perl.spec
    Repository: matthewdeanmartin/whats_that_code
    Filename: tags_data.py
    Repository: NJUSearch/project-code
    Filename: tags_new.py
    Repository: lambci/yumda
    Filename: perl.spec
    📂 Relevant Repositories
    Repository: diff2Html
    Description:
    A library that provides functionality to parse git diffs to HTML with syntax
    highlighting. It includes parsing of unified diffs, which is similar to what
    extract_hunk_lines_from_patch does, focusing on converting patch information into a
    more readable format.
    Repository: GitPython
    Description:
    GitPython is a python library used to interact with Git repositories. While it
    doesn't directly provide a function like extract_hunk_lines_from_patch, it deals with
    git objects and could be used to extend functionalities around git patches, diffs,
    and hunks.
    Repository: pydriller
    Description:
    PyDriller is a Python framework that helps developers in mining software
    repositories. While its primary focus is not on patch or diff handling, it provides
    access to commit data, modifications, and could potentially be used to extract and
    analyze hunks of code changes, similar to the targeted functionality.

    @hussam789
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    hussam789 commented Mar 4, 2024

    🔍 Finding similar code for 'extract_hunk_lines_from_patch'

    🏷 Extracted Keywordspatch, diff, regex, git, hunk                                                                                                     
    🌍 Search Context
    • Global
    • Organization
    🔍 Similar Code Repository: TechNickAI/AICodeBot
    Filename: patch.py
    Repository: henrysky/astroNN
    Filename: patch_util.py
    Repository: pygobject/pygobject-stubs
    Filename: Ggit.pyi
    Repository: google/diff-match-patch
    Filename: diff_match_patch.py
    Repository: ray-project/ray
    Filename: git-clang-format
    📂 Relevant Repositories
    Repository: diff2Html
    Description:
    A library that parses git diffs and generates pretty HTML views. It includes
    functionality for parsing the hunk headers and lines from patches, similar to the
    extract_hunk_lines_from_patch function, focusing on the visual representation of
    diffs.
    Repository: gitpython
    Description:
    GitPython is a python library used to interact with Git repositories. While it
    doesn't directly provide a function like extract_hunk_lines_from_patch, it deals
    extensively with git diffs and patches, which could be manipulated in a similar
    manner to extract specific hunk lines.
    Repository: unified-diff
    Description:
    A library focused on parsing and handling unified diffs. Similar to
    extract_hunk_lines_from_patch, it provides functionality to parse patches and extract
    information from them, including specific lines from hunks.
    Repository: pydriller
    Description:
    Pydriller is a Python framework that helps developers in mining software
    repositories. It includes features for parsing diffs and commits, which could be used
    in a similar way to extract_hunk_lines_from_patch to extract lines from patches for
    analysis.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 4
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants