-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 428
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
x/wasm: add AllDenomMetadata BankQuery #1294
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your PR! 💐
Good work on all layers. I have added some notes and also commented on CosmWasm/cosmwasm#1647. Let's discuss the feature there.
@@ -182,4 +182,6 @@ replace ( | |||
|
|||
// pin version! 126854af5e6d has issues with the store so that queries fail | |||
github.com/syndtr/goleveldb => github.com/syndtr/goleveldb v1.0.1-0.20210819022825-2ae1ddf74ef7 | |||
|
|||
github.com/CosmWasm/wasmvm => ../wasmvm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a local development setup and should be removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I have left this in until the corresponding wasmvm
PR is merged - CosmWasm/wasmvm#409. Once that is merged, I will open a separate PR to upgrade wasmvm
, and then rebase and remove this change.
Leaving this comment as unresolved until that happens.
}) | ||
require.NoError(t, gotErr) | ||
var got keeper.AllDenomMetadataResponse | ||
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(gotBz, &got)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 good test
4b00ad6
to
b93adf0
Compare
b93adf0
to
8b51b67
Compare
Closing in favor of #1426. Thanks @chipshort! |
Please review these related PRs in tandem: