-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Introduced protections against system command injection #4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduced protections against system command injection #4
Conversation
<version>1.26.0-SNAPSHOT</version> | ||
</parent> | ||
<artifactId>sample-application</artifactId> | ||
<dependencies> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This library holds security tools for protecting Java API calls.
License: MIT ✅ | Open source ✅ | More facts
</executions> | ||
</plugin> | ||
</plugins> | ||
</build> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This library holds security tools for protecting Java API calls.
License: MIT ✅ | Open source ✅ | More facts
You’ve installed Korbit to your Github repository but you haven’t created a Korbit account yet! To create your Korbit account and get your PR scans, please visit https://mentor.korbit.ai/dashboard |
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information |
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. 🎉 To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization Sowhat999. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. 🚀 |
Review changes with SemanticDiff. Analyzed 1 of 3 files. Overall, the semantic diff is 4% smaller than the GitHub diff.
|
👋 Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:
|
Important Auto Review SkippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Feedback
Overall, this change significantly improves the security of system command execution in the project. Great work! 👍 |
} else { | ||
// java Desktop not supported - above unlikely to work for Windows so try instead... | ||
Runtime.getRuntime().exec("cmd.exe start " + applicationFile); | ||
SystemCommand.runCommand(Runtime.getRuntime(), "cmd.exe start " + applicationFile); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The use of SystemCommand.runCommand
with string concatenation to execute a command poses a significant security risk, particularly command injection. If applicationFile
is derived from user input or an untrusted source, it could be manipulated to execute arbitrary commands.
To mitigate this risk, consider using a safer approach to execute commands that does not involve concatenation of user-controlled variables. Validate and sanitize any input that forms part of a command, or better yet, use APIs that allow specifying commands and arguments as separate entities to avoid injection vulnerabilities.
Check out the playback for this Pull Request here. |
Hello @Sowhat999. The PR is blocked on your approval. Please review it ASAP. |
6 similar comments
Hello @Sowhat999. The PR is blocked on your approval. Please review it ASAP. |
Hello @Sowhat999. The PR is blocked on your approval. Please review it ASAP. |
Hello @Sowhat999. The PR is blocked on your approval. Please review it ASAP. |
Hello @Sowhat999. The PR is blocked on your approval. Please review it ASAP. |
Hello @Sowhat999. The PR is blocked on your approval. Please review it ASAP. |
Hello @Sowhat999. The PR is blocked on your approval. Please review it ASAP. |
This change may not be a priority right now, so I'll close it. If there was something I could have done better, please let me know! You can also customize me to make sure I'm working with you in the way you want. |
User description
This change hardens all instances of Runtime#exec() to offer protection against attack.
Left unchecked,
Runtime#exec()
can execute any arbitrary system command. If an attacker can control part of the strings used to as program paths or arguments, they could execute arbitrary programs, install malware, and anything else they could do if they had a shell open on the application host.Our change introduces a sandbox which protects the application:
The default restrictions applied are the following:
SystemCommand#runCommand()
attempts to parse the given command, and throw aSecurityException
if multiple commands are present./etc/passwd
, so the sandbox prevents arguments that point to these files that may be targets for exfiltration.There are more options for sandboxing if you are interested in locking down system commands even more.
More reading
I have additional improvements ready for this repo! If you want to see them, leave the comment:
... and I will open a new PR right away!
🧚🤖Powered by Pixeebot (codemod ID: pixee:java/harden-process-creation)
Description
Runtime.getRuntime().exec()
with a secure alternative fromjava-security-toolkit
to prevent system command injection vulnerabilities.java-security-toolkit
as a dependency in the project to facilitate the secure execution of system commands.Changes walkthrough
App.java
Replace Runtime exec with Secure SystemCommand
page-object/sample-application/src/main/java/com/iluwatar/pageobject/App.java
Runtime.getRuntime().exec()
withSystemCommand.runCommand()
to prevent system command injection.pom.xml
Add Java Security Toolkit Dependency
page-object/pom.xml
java-security-toolkit
version1.1.3
to the properties section.java-security-toolkit
dependency in the dependency managementsection.
pom.xml
Include Security Toolkit in Sample Application
page-object/sample-application/pom.xml
java-security-toolkit
dependency to thesample-application
module.
💡 Usage Guide
Checking Your Pull Request
Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.
Talking to CodeAnt AI
Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:
This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.
Check Your Repository Health
To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.