Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hinge line definition does not cover all control surface architectures #631

Closed
MarAlder opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Comments

@MarAlder
Copy link
Collaborator

Current state

  • the hinge line is specified in the path element by an innerHingePoint and and outerHingePoint
  • its xsi and eta coordinates are both defined in the wing component segment as it is the parent of the control surface
  • the eta position of the innerHingePoint and outerHingePoint is determined by the outerShape element -> innerShape/outerShape -> etaLE (etaTE does not influence this coordinate, i.e. no interpolation between LE and TE position)
  • the xsi position (hingeXsi element) is measured from the leading edge of the parent wing structure
  • the z-position of the hing line is specified by the hingeRelHeight element which refers to the local thickness of the wing at the hinge point position (0 = lower skin; 1 = upper skin)

grafik

Problem description

The hinge line cannot be outside of the parent wing geometry, because:

  • eta, xsi and hingeRelHeight may only take values between 0 and 1 and must therefore be within the parent wing geometry

Certain configurations are not possible to model with the current definition, e.g.:

Solution

... will be documented in this issue. Any suggestions welcome.

Current problems to consider in this context:

  • if possible: remain backwards compatible (i.e., additional elements, avoid changes to current definition)
  • in case of an additional offset vector:
    • implicitly fix the origin hinge line to reduce ambiguity?
    • relative coordinates (less problems with scaling of geometry) or absolute coordinates to be consistent with hinge line translation in the step definition?
  • is an additional eta translation necessary for the hinge point? (could solve the problem to define a hinge line which is inside of a canard wing geometry)
rainman110 added a commit to DLR-SC/tigl that referenced this issue Jul 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant