Skip to content

Conversation

tomnof
Copy link
Contributor

@tomnof tomnof commented Sep 30, 2025

Add a picture showing the filter with hierarchical teams

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). Without this format, your pull request will not pass CI, the GitLab pipeline will not run, and you won't get a branch preview. Getting a branch preview makes it easier for us to check any issues with your PR, such as broken links.

If your branch doesn't follow this format, rename it or create a new branch and PR.

[6/5/2025] Merge queue has been disabled on the documentation repo. If you have write access to the repo, the PR has been reviewed by a Documentation team member, and all of the required checks have passed, you can use the Squash and Merge button to merge the PR. If you don't have write access, or you need help, reach out in the #documentation channel in Slack.

Additional notes

Add a picture showing the filter with hierarchical teams
@tomnof tomnof requested a review from a team as a code owner September 30, 2025 01:06
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Images Images are added/removed with this PR label Sep 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@git-thuerk-done git-thuerk-done left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @tomnof looks good! Feel free to click "Squash and merge" once this is ready

@tomnof tomnof merged commit 7951d9f into master Oct 8, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
@tomnof tomnof deleted the tom.nof/update-teams-hierarchies branch October 8, 2025 14:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Images Images are added/removed with this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants