-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
[FEATURE] Select from existing event #8390
Comments
To reduce notifications, issues are locked until they are https://github.com/EddieHubCommunity/LinkFree/labels/%F0%9F%8F%81%20status%3A%20ready%20for%20dev and to be assigned. You can learn more in our contributing guide https://github.com/EddieHubCommunity/LinkFree/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md |
Great idea 👍 what about a button on the event item itself "add me" |
Omg! Even better. I'll update the issue description |
The issue has been unlocked and is now ready for dev. If you would like to work on this issue, you can comment to have it assigned to you. You can learn more in our contributing guide https://github.com/EddieHubCommunity/LinkFree/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md |
@amandamartin-dev after chatting with Eddie here are my thoughts: Problem
Solution
|
This issue look really tempting. If it's finalised, can someone please assign this to me ? |
@webAbhi you have already been assigned an Issue (#8260). As shown in our Contributing Guide we will only assign one issue per person. |
Can I work on this issue? |
@ArnabChatterjee20k the same message as mentioned above applies to you also. You already have an issue assigned to and we only assign one issue per person. |
SOrry for the insanely delayed response! What if the user is in their dashboard already and not viewing the events list to see the "add to profile" button? For me the workflow to add an event is to go straight to my dashboard so I wouldn't think to go to the events page yet. |
Oh good spot 👍 you are right most people will go straight to adding the event in their manage profile. Any ideas on how to solve this? Idea: when they put in the url, we can try to do a soft match against existing event urls and offer suggestions? |
I thought on this for a bit and I can't think of another solution currently so this one sounds like a good place to start. Can always iterate if the UX is confusing or isn't having the intended result (less event duplication over time) |
Hi Eddie, what if we allow user do add duplicate events and do the matching logic in the global events to show only first unique events. So users will still see events in his profile, and it'll not be duplicated in global events. One issue i can think of is, a user with the duplicate event might see event in profile but not find in the global list. |
I think, we should keep event unique in our system as duplicacy will take extra space unnecessarily if many users decides to go to same event . To keep things simple, may be we can add two buttons on "Events" Page : Link Existing Event, Add New Event Steps on clicking "Link Existing Event" :
or
Steps on clicking "Add New Event" :
Let me know if I can be assigned for this feature. Thanks |
Great collaboration everyone 👍 In the events page, events are not duplicated, they are grouped on url already and all profile pictures are displayed on the event. I think we should simplify this issue, otherwise it will grow and be too big to test/review/merge. It is probably best if we start with the easiest option for step one and we can create further issues to add more functionality. I suggest for step 1, we have 2 buttons on the event note: step 2 in another issue, could be do do a search on existing events when they enter the url, which can then prompt the user to accept an existing event and it pre-fills their event form. |
thanks for sharing! , just to clarify the task by adding |
After more thought on this, I wonder if we need to re-achitect the data. Let's park this for now. Sorry for the confusion |
2 steps verification to avoid duplicate events
|
This is a great idea 👍 |
Description
When adding a new event via forms, there should be the ability to select from existing events OR add a new event.
To add yourself to an existing event, there will be a button created next to each future event to add yourself to the event.
Clicking on the button will add to your event list
Screenshots
No response
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: