-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Containment check #68
Comments
where agreed for overloading |
.. still we can use |
Yes, |
we can implement it with sets, i.e. using |
I thought about it and I think it is more efficient to unwrap a Where would we define the conversion function? Inside |
Thanks for this pointer. I will implement the "dot product" solution from the bottom of the page. The algorithms in this link work for nonconvex polygons, and at the bottom it is said "Simpler algorithms are possible for [...] convex polygons [...]." |
Add a containment check
∈(x, S)
for all sets.For some we already have
is_contained
. I preferin
instead (the Julia alias for∈
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: