Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolution AND description text for base defence #1812

Closed
molemanBT opened this issue Jun 18, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Resolution AND description text for base defence #1812

molemanBT opened this issue Jun 18, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@molemanBT
Copy link

v0.47.6

The descriptor text for base attack (defender) says:

"Ensure that at least 3 individual units from the following force(s) and unit(s) survive:
Base Turrets
Base Civilian Units

The following unit(s) deployed by your employer must survive. Each one destroyed results in a 1 point penalty to your contract score:
Federated Suns
Griffin GRF-1N

Destroy, cripple or force the withdrawal of at least 50% of the following enemy force(s):
Capellan Confederation Force #2
Capellan Confederation

Ensure that at least 50% individual units from the following force(s) and unit(s) survive:
Shield Lance
Federated Suns
Griffin GRF-1N

Winner controls the battlefield after the battle.
Losing this battle will end the contract with an early defeat."

The italicised part is brutal, and I don't think it was part of the scenario before? When the scenario resolves, you inevitably can't save every one of the puny base defenders so you end up with a massive hit (-4 in this latest instance) to your contract score. Is this intentional?

I think it would work better to remove the Federated suns force from the above conditions.

The Ill Winds30020110.zip

@sixlettervariables sixlettervariables added this to the 0.48-stable milestone Oct 2, 2020
@sixlettervariables sixlettervariables modified the milestones: 0.48-stable, 0.49-dev Dec 28, 2020
IllianiCBT added a commit to IllianiCBT/mekhq that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2024
HammerGS added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 23, 2024
+ PR #3867: Adjusted Retirement TN and Payout Values
+ Fix #3877: MekHQ units aren't defaulting to active probes for sensors
+ Fix #1812: AtB/StratCon] Base Attack (Defender) Objective Changes
+ PR #3892: Corrected Typo in Mass Repair Dialog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants