Skip to content

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jul 19, 2017

Ping @NathanaelA @Pip3r4o #799 (comment)

@ns-bot
Copy link

ns-bot commented Jul 19, 2017

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jul 19, 2017

run ci

1 similar comment
@petekanev
Copy link
Contributor

run ci

@ns-bot
Copy link

ns-bot commented Jul 24, 2017

💔

@petekanev
Copy link
Contributor

@vbresults thanks for your contribution, however the changes do not appear to fix the #799 issue, because although the java execution of the static binding generator won't fail, it won't do much either, since it receives no jar files as input.

Ref: https://github.com/NativeScript/android-runtime/blob/master/android-static-binding-generator/project/build.gradle#L262 - The current list of jar file paths is empty, judging by the build log that @KingAndroid sent us a week ago.

@ghost ghost closed this Jul 24, 2017
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jul 26, 2017

@Pip3r4o Is there a chance that the changes I made are necessary either way, to prevent cli from adding symlinks for example? Also, until the official fix, is there something we can do about the empty current list?

@petekanev
Copy link
Contributor

@vbresults changes in the #798 PR propose major refactoring of the build script, and symlinks should not be a concern. We'll still consider if we should include your changes for overall better code quality and/or readability.

We've not planned or executed on an 'official fix' yet, as we are unable to reproduce the issue reported in #799.

setProperties (https://github.com/NativeScript/android-runtime/blob/master/build-artifacts/project-template-gradle/build.gradle#L727) is the task that collects the jars (https://github.com/NativeScript/android-runtime/blob/master/build-artifacts/project-template-gradle/build.gradle#L589), which are then passed as a list of strings to the static binding generator. I suppose you could copy-paste the logic, although from what I could tell reading the provided build logs, those tasks had passed successfully.

Having said that, I'd appreciate it if you could share information you consider will be relevant to reproducing the problem on my end.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants