vscode-extensions.redhat.java: init at 0.76.0

[rhoriguchi]

Motivation for this change

Add support for Language Support for Java(TM) by Red Hat VS Code extension.

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • macOS
  • other Linux distributions
• Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
• Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[collares]

Something went wrong with the versionAtLeast check, and this is blocking channels: https://nix-cache.s3.amazonaws.com/log/zb6c22znzcvcnjkdmar5ylj3944vy1a1-nixpkgs-tarball-21.05pre277906.c430ccbb77a.drv

[collares]

jdk does not have a version attribute on Darwin: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/compilers/openjdk/darwin/default.nix

[siraben]

This breaks nixpkgs-review on darwin

$ nix-env -f /Users/siraben/.cache/nixpkgs-review/rev-64ed9a9a999bf1f8d44f8fb8dd2ee307de1aa3de-dirty/nixpkgs -qaP --xml --out-path --show-trace --meta
error: attribute 'version' missing

       at /Users/siraben/.cache/nixpkgs-review/rev-64ed9a9a999bf1f8d44f8fb8dd2ee307de1aa3de-dirty/nixpkgs/pkgs/misc/vscode-extensions/default.nix:607:44:

          606|           license = lib.licenses.epl20;
          607|           broken = lib.versionAtLeast "11" jdk.version;
             |                                            ^
          608|         };

       … while evaluating 'versionOlder'

[ajs124]

This has been broken without response by the author or committer for 2 days, I'm inclined to just revert this instead of blocking nixos-unstable-small for longer.

[rhoriguchi]

This has been broken without response by the author or committer for 2 days, I'm inclined to just revert this instead of blocking nixos-unstable-small for longer.

The issue is I'm not sure what the correct course of action is. Remove the check or add a version to jdk on darwin?

cc @SuperSandro2000 @jonringer

[collares]

See also #117214