Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

surge-XT: unstable-2021-12-11 -> 1.0.1 #154044

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2022
Merged

Conversation

magnetophon
Copy link
Member

@magnetophon magnetophon commented Jan 8, 2022

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
    • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@ofborg ofborg bot added 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 labels Jan 8, 2022
@magnetophon magnetophon changed the title surge-XT: unstable-2021-12-11 -> unstable-2022-01-08 surge-XT: unstable-2021-12-11 -> 1.0.0 Jan 29, 2022
@magnetophon
Copy link
Member Author

First stable release is out!
Pinging some random nix audio/synth maintainers:
@OPNA2608 @nico202 @mitchmindtree @michalrus @astro @minijackson

@equill
Copy link
Contributor

equill commented Jan 29, 2022

Verified per guidelines:

  • package name fits guidelines
  • package version fits guidelines
  • package build on x86_64-linux
  • executables tested on x86_64-linux
  • all depending packages build

@OPNA2608
Copy link
Contributor

Should prolly bump juce-lv2 to the latest commit on lv2 branch (lv2-porting-project/JUCE@000e15a) as well.

@magnetophon
Copy link
Member Author

magnetophon commented Jan 30, 2022

Should prolly bump juce-lv2 to the latest commit on lv2 branch (lv2-porting-project/JUCE@000e15a) as well.

Building with that commit gives me the following error when I try to run the LV2:

The program 'jalv.gtk' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'.
  (Details: serial 54 error_code 3 request_code 20 minor_code 0)
  (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
   that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
   To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
   option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
   backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)

Both Ardour and jalv.gtk do this.
Elaborate testing at lv2-porting-project/JUCE#18

@magnetophon magnetophon changed the title surge-XT: unstable-2021-12-11 -> 1.0.0 surge-XT: unstable-2021-12-11 -> 1.0.1 Feb 27, 2022
@magnetophon
Copy link
Member Author

Updated the PR from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1

@Artturin
Copy link
Member

Artturin commented May 5, 2022

these binary names contain spaces, could they be changed?

[nix-shell:~/.cache/nixpkgs-review/pr-154044]$ ls ./results/surge-XT/bin/
'Surge XT'  'Surge XT Effects'

@magnetophon
Copy link
Member Author

@Artturin I asked upstream, and they say they consciously chose this name and that spaces are valid characters in binary names.
They also said it would probably work if we change the name.
May I ask why you requested this change?

Copy link
Member

@mitchmindtree mitchmindtree left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@Artturin
Copy link
Member

@Artturin I asked upstream, and they say they consciously chose this name and that spaces are valid characters in binary names. They also said it would probably work if we change the name. May I ask why you requested this change?

because its weird
what a weird choice by upstream

@Artturin Artturin merged commit e542055 into NixOS:master May 10, 2022
@magnetophon magnetophon deleted the Surge-XT branch May 10, 2022 17:31
@magnetophon
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants