-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
haskellPackages.clash-prelude: fix build by disabling tests #178868
Conversation
@@ -2604,4 +2604,7 @@ in { | |||
purescript-ast = purescriptBrokenFlag (super.purescript-ast.overrideScope purescriptOverlay); | |||
|
|||
purenix = super.purenix.overrideScope purescriptOverlay; | |||
|
|||
# tests use doctest-parallel which produces some errors during testing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A couple things:
- Could you rebase this on the
haskell-updates
branch? We generally ask that all haskell-related PRs go to that branch. - Are you sure that these doctests are failing because of some Nix/sandbox related reason, and not because they are actually broken for some reason? Do you know why they are broken? Does it make sense to have an upstream issue tracking this?
- It looks like
clash-prelude
is inpkgs/development/haskell-modules/configuration-hackage2nix/transitive-broken.yaml
. Could you remove it from that list and confirm that it no longer depends on any packages that are marked broken?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did points 1 and 3. Regarding 2, I'm not really sure why the tests fail, it was not straightforward and I didn't have time to investigate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cdepillabout is there anything more I need to do?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, this looks good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be available in master
when #181822 is merged in.
Description of changes
Things done
sandbox = true
set innix.conf
? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh
to update generated release notes