mgmt, nex: init at unstable

[urandom2]

Description of changes

This change adds two packages: mgmt and nex. The latter is a build dependency for the former. Unfortunately both do not have stable releases, thus each tracks the tip of their respective upstream branches. Go module pseudo versions are used.

mgmt: Next generation distributed, event-driven, parallel config management!
nex: Lexer for Go

Fixes #98458 purpleidea/mgmt#610

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1342

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1373

[SuperSandro2000]

Build fails with make: /usr/bin/env: No such file or directory which means the program env tries to launch does not exist.

[urandom2]

this is what I was commenting about back here, #198963 (comment), but after rerunning things it works on my system and produces /nix/store/l8gi44nywd0dsqfwsh7wfvz37787acgy-mgmt-unstable-2022-10-24.

with my latest changes applied, does this not work for you?

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1416

[SuperSandro2000]

with my latest changes applied, does this not work for you?

I didn't test it on my machine but ofborg failed with that and ofborg has the final say.

[urandom2]

ah, sweet; I was just having trouble reproducing the failure, and that is the pointer I needed!

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1471

[gador]

This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review with nixpkgs-review-checks extension. It is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch).

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 198963 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package failed to build and are new build failure:

• mgmt: log was empty

1 package built:

• nex

The following issues got detected with the above build packages.
Please fix at least the ones listed with your changed packages:

mgmt:

warning: unclear-gpl
gpl3 is a deprecated license, please check if project uses gpl3Plus or gpl3Only and change meta.license accordingly.

Near pkgs/applications/system/mgmt/default.nix:69:5:

   |
69 |     license = licenses.gpl3;
   |     ^

See: https://github.com/jtojnar/nixpkgs-hammering/blob/master/explanations/unclear-gpl.md
warning: unused-argument
Unused argument: bash.
Near pkgs/applications/system/mgmt/default.nix:2:3:

  |
2 | , bash
  |   ^

nex:

got build log for '/nix/store/dvqp804qlqwgsfqvpfafmvk540xjjc1b-nex-unstable-2021-03-30' from 'daemon'
When evaluating attribute ‘nex’:
warning: unclear-gpl
gpl3 is a deprecated license, please check if project uses gpl3Plus or gpl3Only and change meta.license accordingly.

Near pkgs/development/tools/parsing/nex/default.nix:24:5:

   |
24 |     license = licenses.gpl3;
   |     ^

See: https://github.com/jtojnar/nixpkgs-hammering/blob/master/explanations/unclear-gpl.md

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1483

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1518

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1541

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1571

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1605

[SuperSandro2000]

Please rebase

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1653

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/1683