Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gmic-qt: refactor #294522

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2024
Merged

gmic-qt: refactor #294522

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2024

Conversation

AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member

  • bring uniformity to variants set
  • set sourceRoot
  • intern libsForQt5
  • migrate to by-name

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

- bring uniformity to variants set
- set sourceRoot
- intern libsForQt5
- migrate to by-name
Copy link
Member

@lilyinstarlight lilyinstarlight left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Diff itself looks okay to me and it seems to build just fine for gmic-qt and gimpPlugins.gmic on all 4 major platforms

@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres marked this pull request as ready for review March 9, 2024 18:44
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/1515

@lilyinstarlight
Copy link
Member

Ofborg hasn't finished aarch64-darwin, but I tested it manually, so I'll go ahead and merge

Thanks!

@lilyinstarlight lilyinstarlight merged commit 329f924 into NixOS:master Mar 9, 2024
25 of 26 checks passed
@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

With some luck, maybe we can delegate the next merges to the bots :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants