-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
haskell: Don't use package-qualified and non-package-qualified grep #320148
haskell: Don't use package-qualified and non-package-qualified grep #320148
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are just waiting for the next set rebuild, right?
Or we merge this into staging… |
I mean in the end that will likely also trigger another rebuild (unless we are careful with the timing) only advantage is it doesn’t happen on our branch. So I suggest we just wait for the merge impending merge and then merge it here. |
No rush from my side. It was just a drive-by cleanup. |
this seems like it was just forgotten, so i will ping the people involved @sternenseemann @maralorn @nh2 sorry if i was mistaken. |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
@ofborg build haskell.packages.ghc948.microlens |
Why test 948 specifically? |
GHC >= 9.6 needs to be rebuilt. |
Description of changes
Using
grep
in 2 different ways can cause confusion and increase the closure, especially if it's not the same grep.Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.