Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ref #3250 Fixes #3251: split repository in ro/rw #116

Merged

Conversation

fanf
Copy link
Member

@fanf fanf commented Feb 10, 2013

No description provided.

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html>.
<parent>
<groupId>com.normation</groupId>
<artifactId>parent-pom</artifactId>
<version>2.6.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<version>2.6.0-scala_2.10-SNAPSHOT</version>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pom version should not change, a rebase on should fix that

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, clearly, well spotted. I though I changed all of them.

@VinceMacBuche
Copy link
Member

Don't you think that objects named "roXXXrepository" or "woXXXrepository" should be name "xxxReader" or "xxxWriter" ?

@VinceMacBuche
Copy link
Member

The same questions about the classes "WoXXXRepository" and "RoXXXRepository" being renamed to "XXXWriter" "XXXReader"


}

class RwLDAPDirectiveRepository(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't it be WoLDAPDirectiveRepository ?

@ncharles
Copy link
Member

Appart from the TW/RO, this is really nice ! I let you answer on or correct the names of the repos

ncharles added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2013
…r_on_config

Ref #3250 Fixes #3251: split repository in ro/rw
@ncharles ncharles merged commit 8e38a37 into Normation:master Feb 14, 2013
@ncharles
Copy link
Member

Thank you !

@fanf fanf deleted the bug_3211/dev/transactionnal_behavior_on_config branch March 15, 2024 09:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants