New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposed RA Balance Changes 2019 #16418
Comments
Thanks for updating the comment, this looks much better now. Some of the changes will be very controversial and the overall amount of changes is too much for one balance PR. I would suggest to exclude the very very controversial changes like the sniper, tank drop, intel drop and minimap changes for now. These are not balance changes but new features and it is very unlikely that the attempt to sneak them in with other (controversial) balance changes will be successful. But even after this there remain way too many changes - I don't know how this should ever get through the review process if you don't massively cut down the changes. IMO focus on helicopters, thief and mammoth and exclude everything else. Also consider that other people might be working on similar things already and have announced that earlier than you, like #16331 (comment). Please give the other people here a chance to understand what you are doing and the opportunity to participate by opening issues for the problems you are trying to solve or by participating in existing issues/discussions. |
@matjaeck I have considered that other people could be working on it and I've been following their progress. For example the Black Hawk sprite I use was made to replace hind with pchote reviewing it on Discord. I'm thinking about a replacement for the tank drop. The current community ideas are tank chronoin (some tanks would chrono in that you could control and chrono out when the timer runs out) and chrono vortex. Germany & France & England specific traits need to be reworked and it can't be done without adding new units / support powers powers. Naval needs a long list of changes to even start a path on being balanced. I Include some small changes here too such as Submarines being able to kill walls. Could make separate pr's for them to make this list shorter if necessary For now I will continue testing and tweaking values. I will only decrease it's size after the review process or when I find better solutions to problems |
The things I noted have all been communicated to you earlier by multiple people, you seem to be resistant to their advice though. I have big doubts, after reading your comment here and your latest forum posts (in which you also seem to ignore other people's suggestion and exclusively focus on your vision while considering your opinion in line with a "perfect" state of things) that you are ready to participate in a big open source project like OpenRA is. You are of course free to do whatever you want, but it will not happen that you damage the spirit of this project with your involvement. |
It might seem this way because most of the discussions and support I get are from discord, private messages, game lobbies Also I would like to fix more systems and problems this game has but goal of this patch is to solve the current biggest balance concerns caused by the previous update, streamline stealth, rebalance naval, improve Germany / France / England faction specific traits and fix some miniature long lasting issues. I guess I can give up some stealth, G/F/E changes, move those miniature changes to separate pr's and encourage more people to write in this issue |
Oh and also I made this issue when most concerns and issues people had had been addressed and accounted for |
On a sidenote, we need some balance changes merged for next release. My main point is to decrease the mammoth tusk missile range like suggested above. This change has been discussed on the forum and the community overall agreed with it I think. If I get the feeling that the "normal" balance PR will be impossible to review, I'll file this change myself. |
I'm not someone who plays too often, so i'm not sure how much word i can have on balance, but i wanna say my opinion on stuff here.
I'm neutral on most of those, except imo Radar should keep the stealth detection.
I don't like this idea in an design perspective rather than balance. As i said on discord i would be complately OK with a Free Radar checkbox (disabled by default). Or we implement something like in Dune 2, which you can see your buildings on the radar even without Outpost.
I'm not sure how much it is gonna help but i'm ok with that change.
I see those as bug fixes that will have balance effect than actual balance changes. Agree with the changes.
I'm not 100% sure, but i'm positive on the change.
That was pretty much what i wanted to be done with the Hind. Definetly agree. But could be done in a seperate PR than the actual balance changes.
Neutral on the topic. If added, should be handled in its own PR imo.
Should help to have this.
Positive on the change.
Neutral on the changes. I'm not sure about the current state of the units.
My overall state on the Soviet Navy have always been that they need a new Siege Submarine and Missile Sub should be repurpsed to be a better AA. But your sounds better than the current state too.
Definetly should be changed to match.
Sounds good to me. |
The group of changes above would be a major overhaul that doesn't mesh with the direction we've taken balance since Soscared's first balance patch. New units and support powers especially. I won't be able to include most of what's up there in my eventual balance PR. |
The core gameplay practically doesn't change, naval is an exception ofc. I already have maps with all of these changes done so there won't be technical problems. We can scrap the new support powers but what to put in their place? England is currently the weakest faction and adding in the sniper could change it. I can revert globalisation of mgg thus removing the need for Intel drop. Then we come to German Chronosphere. The normal chrono needs a buff and a good way to do it is by globalising the German one. It leaves an empty gap and currently there are 3 ideas I mentioned that can fill it. I picked the one that is easiest to test out |
I´m agreeing with Mustapha on most of his quotes. Punsho is gonna tackle lots of issues/long standing ignored design flaws that RA currently has like Naval in general, Stealth Detection inconsistency and most important the overall design of the Allies subfactions which has to be addressed. We will have to play/gather lots of games to see how his ideas take effect on RA1. Punsho is a very active member in the community and does listen to the feedback of people so discarding him now would be a huge loss for the future of OpenRA. |
I just fail to understand what makes it so hard to file an issue titled "Stealth is inconsistent" or "Rework allied subfactions" with a reasonable issue summary. I hope we find a way to improve and make balancing a less exhausting topic. |
@matjaeck I hope we do. When I wrote my changes I tried to explain them as simple and straight forward as possible. Connecting all dots and not leaving much for interpretation. After that I questioned tens of people if they found anything in my balance unclear and what and why they disliked. So far you're the first one that didn't understand my intentions so do you have tips on how I should improve my wording? |
@punsho I will probably focus on other topics that I find more interesting and easier to support so if everyone else is fine with your changes, I'm not going to be the one guy blocking progress, but also not the one helping to get them merged. I have trust in Smitty that he'll handle this. |
🙌 Over the years the "balance" changes have flattened differences between OpenRA units. Actually all 1v1 games look almost the same, we always see the same army compositions, the same timings, and they are all capped to tier 2. We also barely see tier 3 units because tier 3 doesn't add much value. Please make tier 3 worth it again, for every faction. Please bring back the mammoth tank we had in 2013-2014 ! 😭 |
The Blackhawk cameo needs tweaking, it's text bar needs to a pixel taller to fit in with all other cameos. |
Good catch, it's name is still not final |
After more discussions around the proposed changes here I'd like to sum up my thoughts on a potential rework of general and faction specific support / super powers: As pointed out in many places allies are not only in a weaker spot balance wise at the moment, but also lack in terms of game experience. Their faction specific build options / support / super powers do not reach the fun factor and the effectiveness of the Russian or Ukrainian arsenal. Since adding new units is always very difficult and problematic and porting features from later games likewise is, utilizing existing concepts and artwork makes more sense. The discussion on Discord has resulted in the proposal to implement an ability to call in temporary chrono-reinforcements consisting of light and or medium tanks. Based on the proposed changes here and the discussions on discord I have these considerations: This ability could be made available as a faction specific ability (for example Germany) while replacing their advanced chronosphere. The chronosphere would it turn be normalized across all allied factions and buffed to be similar to the old advanced chronosphere, since the current regular chronosphere is broadly considered useless compared to the iron curtain. To fix the situation of England, additional invasive changes appear to be required. I don't really like that we take the MGG out of the standard allied arsenal but it is the only remaining vehicle that we can give them. Both ideas to toggle shroud generation or to change how enemy units respond to shroud have their problems / will need further discussion so I suggest skipping this for now. Regarding England's second trait, the recently introduced directional support powers could be utilized in form of a spy paradrop with tbd details (disguised / count). This would be compatible with the suggested ability of resetting super weapons timers in #16647 as these buildings have no bibs to drop off and can be walled off easily. France seems to be already interesting so can stay as it is. |
Possibly closed by #16803. |
sure |
SFNO (Stealth & Faction & Naval Overhaul)
I've been working on RA balance for about a month. Here I streamline stealth, rework England / France / Germany faction specific traits, overhaul Naval balance and address new issues caused by the previous update. It also contains planned features such as Hind to Soviet
So far it was well received by the competitive community. If anyone has concerns or questions don't hesitate to contact me. Here's the link to the change log with explanations and test maps.
These are the raw changes (outdated)
Streamlining stealth:
Balance changes:
General
Allies
Units
SupportPowers
Soviets
Units
Naval Overhaul:
Allies
Units:
Structures:
Soviets
Units:
Structures:
This can close #16424 #16038 #15100 #14100
Current PRs: #16514 #16472
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: