Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation of what flags mean #129

Closed
josephwb opened this issue Mar 23, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Documentation of what flags mean #129

josephwb opened this issue Mar 23, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@josephwb
Copy link
Member

Little to no information exists as to what the different OTT flags mean. The wiki page points to taxomachine code, but little information exists there.

Came up because a paleo person was trying to understand "extinct_direct" vs. "extinct_inherited".

@jar398 jar398 self-assigned this Jun 26, 2015
@josephwb
Copy link
Member Author

josephwb commented Aug 6, 2015

Can we make this a priority? I don't believe there even exists a complete list of flags. We need this for moving forward with the next synthesis.

josephwb referenced this issue in OpenTreeOfLife/treemachine Aug 6, 2015
@jar398
Copy link
Member

jar398 commented Aug 12, 2015

@josephwb
Copy link
Member Author

Much better!

"merged" probably needs a bit of extra information.
"unplaced" is a bit of a head-scratcher. so, do we not want to include them? may be good species (or whatever), just of unknown placement. i guess the same goes for "incertae sedis": there are certainly real bird species without known taxonomic/phylogenetic relationships.

@jar398
Copy link
Member

jar398 commented Aug 12, 2015

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Joseph W. Brown notifications@github.com
wrote:

Much better!

"merged" probably needs a bit of extra information.

will get on it.

"unplaced" is a bit of a head-scratcher. so, do we not want to include
them? may be good species (or whatever), just of unknown placement. i guess
the same goes for "incertae sedis": there are certainly real bird species
without known taxonomic/phylogenetic relationships.

I've been saying this for years now. Stephen has always said they couldn't
be included, but I never understood why.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#129 (comment)
.

@jar398 jar398 closed this as completed Nov 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants