Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update MAVLink RSSI field interpretation to latest versions #11514

Open
hamishwillee opened this issue Feb 21, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Update MAVLink RSSI field interpretation to latest versions #11514

hamishwillee opened this issue Feb 21, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@hamishwillee
Copy link
Contributor

hamishwillee commented Feb 21, 2019

The MAVLink definition of .rssi field on the following messages has been redefined from 0-100, 255=not used to 0-254, 255=not used: RC_CHANNELS, RC_CHANNELS_RAW, RC_CHANNELS_SCALED, RADIO_STATUS

Action is to move to the new definition. @LorenzMeier who best to assign to this?

Reference: mavlink/mavlink#1027

@hamishwillee
Copy link
Contributor Author

This needs to be done.

@stale stale bot removed the Admin: Wont fix label Jun 27, 2019
@PX4 PX4 deleted a comment from stale bot Sep 25, 2019
@stale stale bot removed the Admin: Wont fix label Sep 25, 2019
@PX4 PX4 deleted a comment from stale bot Sep 25, 2019
@julianoes
Copy link
Contributor

julianoes commented Sep 25, 2019

By the way. I hate the bot.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 24, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Dec 24, 2019
@bys1123
Copy link
Contributor

bys1123 commented May 3, 2020

Any Updates?

@stale stale bot removed the stale label May 3, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 1, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Aug 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants