Make sure we compile for App Extensions from source. #109
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Where's my holy water when I need it?
nlutsenko
force-pushed
the
nlutsenko.extensions
branch
from
2b9e6f7 to
4c269ef
Compare
nlutsenko
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2015
Make sure we compile for App Extensions from source.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tested that it compiles for extensions by enabling
allow extension only APIs on both targets.We probably should have a sample application with a sample extension inside, so we can test this on a CI.
Fixes #43 though, since we fully compile for app extensions now.