Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Aggregate code coverage analysis #87

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Nov 27, 2022
Merged

Conversation

tpoisot
Copy link
Member

@tpoisot tpoisot commented Nov 26, 2022

Closes #62

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 0.00% // Head: 42.25% // Increases project coverage by +42.25% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (75849f2) compared to base (ec07e05).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            main      #87       +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   0.00%   42.25%   +42.25%     
==========================================
  Files          8       52       +44     
  Lines        336     1647     +1311     
==========================================
+ Hits           0      696      +696     
- Misses       336      951      +615     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 42.25% <ø> (+42.25%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
Fauxcurrences/src/bootstrap.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
SimpleSDMDatasets/src/downloader.jl 76.66% <0.00%> (ø)
...ets/src/providers/WorldClim/worldclim_future_v2.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
GBIF/src/query.jl 77.77% <0.00%> (ø)
SimpleSDMLayers/src/operations/mosaic.jl 96.55% <0.00%> (ø)
SimpleSDMLayers/src/operations/sliding.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
SimpleSDMLayers/src/lib/coordinateconversion.jl 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
GBIF/src/occurrence.jl 94.33% <0.00%> (ø)
GBIF/src/taxon.jl 76.47% <0.00%> (ø)
SimpleSDMLayers/src/integrations/GBIF.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 34 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@tpoisot tpoisot marked this pull request as ready for review November 26, 2022 22:18
@tpoisot tpoisot merged commit c2c2880 into main Nov 27, 2022
@tpoisot tpoisot deleted the chore/test-result-aggregation branch November 27, 2022 21:33
@tpoisot tpoisot restored the chore/test-result-aggregation branch November 27, 2022 22:06
@tpoisot tpoisot deleted the chore/test-result-aggregation branch February 2, 2023 17:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Find a way to aggregate the code coverage
2 participants