-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
workspace: Update sdformat to latest release 8.4.0 #12268
Conversation
+@EricCousineau-TRI for feature review, please. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1.
Reviewable status: needs at least two assigned reviewers
+@soonho-tri for platform review per schedule (tomorrow), please. |
@drake-jenkins-bot mac-catalina-clang-bazel-experimental-release please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1.
Reviewable status: 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @jwnimmer-tri)
tools/workspace/sdformat/repository.bzl, line 10 at r1 (raw file):
# From the following branch: # https://bitbucket.org/osrf/sdformat/commits/branch/default commit = "6bb8c1cc6615" # v8.4.0
nit, can we use sdformat8_8.4.0
here? (found a list of tags from https://bitbucket.org/osrf/sdformat/downloads/?tab=tags)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: complete! all discussions resolved, LGTM from assignees soonho-tri(platform),EricCousineau-TRI(platform)
tools/workspace/sdformat/repository.bzl, line 10 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, soonho-tri (Soonho Kong) wrote…
nit, can we use
sdformat8_8.4.0
here? (found a list of tags from https://bitbucket.org/osrf/sdformat/downloads/?tab=tags)
OK I will check in the future. My recollection is no.
This change is