chore!: Improve permissions check on licenses endpoints

[matheusbsilva137]

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

• Improve permissions check on licenses endpoints by using the permissionsRequired property.

Issue(s)

CORE-390

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

The intention for this PR is to improve code readability and make unauthorized erros more standardized. No side effects are expected. We're considering this a breaking change since unauthorized errors are being changed to follow the same standard when possible.

[dionisio-bot]

Looks like this PR is ready to merge! 🎉
If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 0b7cf6c

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 53.45%. Comparing base (a3e9e9b) to head (0b7cf6c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on release-7.0.0.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-7.0.0   #32354      +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage          54.41%   53.45%   -0.97%     
=================================================
  Files               2325     2262      -63     
  Lines              51772    50734    -1038     
  Branches           10654    10379     -275     
=================================================
- Hits               28172    27118    -1054     
- Misses             21090    21164      +74     
+ Partials            2510     2452      -58     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	50.73% <ø> (-1.98%)	⬇️
unit	73.31% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.