Skip to content

Conversation

fupduck
Copy link
Contributor

@fupduck fupduck commented Nov 15, 2024

I wasn't sure which license the code is released under (see #18 )
According to mvnrepository the license is the Apache 2.0 license.
To make it more obvious I would propose to add this LICENSE file (taken from apache).

Thanks for the great lib.

closes #18

@dpastor dpastor requested review from a team, jdelga, pmartinbTEF and dpastor and removed request for a team and pmartinbTEF December 20, 2024 12:39
Copy link
Contributor

@dpastor dpastor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @fupduck, sorry for the late response, yes, it should be licensed as Apache License 2.0.

I verified the file and license content is correct.

Thanks for your contribution!

@dpastor dpastor merged commit c28b86f into Telefonica:main Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

License
3 participants